I see that there was a patch committed on this, but I think it's not quite right, specifically in the Makefile.am area.

In the top-level Makefile.am, the following statement was added:

        cd libltdl && $(MAKE) local-install-files

However, there's no such target in libltdl/Makefile.am (nor libltdl/Makefile). Was install-local-data meant, instead?


On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:55 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I question that we can rely on tar being installed, although I have not
come across a system where it isn't.

Maybe I should add a --no-tar option to fallback to 'cp -p' to cover that eventuality?

I take it back. GCS allows us to rely on a tar command being available.


Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook


-- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/



_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to