On Sunday 24 November 2002 6:23 pm, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> One of the problems we're running into getting KDE working on Darwin is
> libtool's concept of a "module", and how it's mapped onto Darwin's
> linker behavior.
This was talked about some time ago by Michael Matz and myself.
> To get aro
It's the correct solution AFAICS - from the same sources two
libtool libraries are built - one is a system library that
gets linked to the system binary. And the module libtool
archive is separate from that. Both .la will be able to pick
up the same .lo being compiled along, so it is nothing more
t
On Monday 25 November 2002 10:04 am, Guido Draheim wrote:
> It's the correct solution AFAICS - from the same sources two
> libtool libraries are built - one is a system library that
> gets linked to the system binary. And the module libtool
> archive is separate from that. Both .la will be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
>Feel free to take the patches from NetBSD pkgsrc and makes noises with
the KDE
people. http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/software/packages.html
No need to make noise with the KDE people, I am reading this list
*grins* If you have a patch a
Ooops, so I did not read the patch too closely - thanks for
the clarification. IOW, there are now two dummy binaries,
one is the system executable, the other is the dlopen-able
module, and both depend on a single system lib*.la - cute!
just to check back with the darwin'ers: a dlopen().so can
link
Hy!
I use libtool 1.4.2, automake 1.4-p5, autoconf 2.13 on RedHat linux 7.3.
The is the folowing error ...:
PREPROCESSING ...
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link c++ -g -O0 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -rdynamic
-L/usr/local/omniORB/lib/i586_linux_2.0_glibc2.1
-L../../COMMON/lib/LINUX2.4 -L../../COMMON/lib -
**
do you have a /usr/local/lib/.libs/ directory ?
**
Szekely Izabella wrote:
Hy!
I use libtool 1.4.2, automake 1.4-p5, autoconf 2.13 on RedHat linux 7.3.
The is the folowing error ...:
PREPROCESSING ...
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link c++ -g -O0 -L/usr/X
To clarify a bit - the link-line does not have a -L for some .libs.
Any .libs of a -L is searched automatically. If that is not the
case then the next guess comes at some .la to be copied manually
around instead of being installed. May be libmp3lame.la and
libshout.la are somewhere around? - notice
No, I don't have!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Guido Draheim
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Szekely Izabella
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wrong path at linking
**
do you have a /usr/local/lib/.libs/ direc
Szekely Izabella wrote:
Hy!
I use libtool 1.4.2, automake 1.4-p5, autoconf 2.13 on RedHat linux 7.3.
You should at least try it with newest released versions of these softwares.
Earnie.
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.o
On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 am, David wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > Feel free to take the patches from NetBSD pkgsrc and makes noises with
> > the KDE people. http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/software/packages.html
> >
> No need to make noise with
That's great news. I cannot, however, promise to have these available
anytime
soon. I would appreciate help. Anyone?
I can certainly help out with this. While waiting for more input on
this thread, I actually ended up coming up with the same solution last
night. I woke up this morning to find
I have the following in a Makefile.am:
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES=libapttlog.la
libapttlog_la_SOURCES=aptt/log/log.c
AM_CPPFLAGS=@INCLTDL@ -I$(top_srcdir)/src -I$(top_builddir)/src
libapttlog_la_LIBADD=@LIBLTDL@
lib_LTLIBRARIES=libaptttest.la
libaptttest_la_SOURCES=aptt/test/test.c
libaptttest_la_LIBADD=
A week ago I popped this into development libtool:
2002-11-18 Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* ltmain.in: When using gcc, pass -mfoo to the linker
via $compiler_flags in order to pass architecture information to
the linker (e.g. 32 vs 64-bit). This may also be accom
==> "pw" == Philip Willoughby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pw> I have the following in a Makefile.am:
pw> pkglib_LTLIBRARIES=libapttlog.la
pw> libapttlog_la_SOURCES=aptt/log/log.c AM_CPPFLAGS=@INCLTDL@
pw> -I$(top_srcdir)/src -I$(top_builddir)/src
pw> libapttlog_la_LIBADD=@LIBLT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==> "pw" == Philip Willoughby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pw> I have the following in a Makefile.am:
pw> pkglib_LTLIBRARIES=libapttlog.la
pw> libapttlog_la_SOURCES=aptt/log/log.c AM_CPPFLAGS=@INCLTDL@
pw> -I$(top_srcdir)/src -I$(top_builddir)/src
pw> l
Carl D. Roth wrote:
I had the same problem - libtool does not like destdir-install
with two libraries being interdependent. I had a look through
the sources how to pass it down to libtool - but the automake
generated install-line for the .la will now pass an extra
argument. Without help from autom
An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable
to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is
there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules?
Max
--
---
Max Horn
Software Developer
em
Ummm, if I understand your problem, this has been fixed in CVS HEAD:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/libtool-patches/2002-November/002159.html
and following thread.
However, it was never committed on the 1.4.x branch, even though it was
submitted prior to the 1.4.3 release. Unfortunately, 1.4.x
Hi,
I've found no support for AIX 5 in automake, autoconf,
or libtool (not even config.guess!).
Any libtool developer interested in teaming up to add
AIX 5.x support to libtool? I have a handful
of settings that I tweeked by hand to get things working
right. I can just describe what set
Gary:
Have you tried CVS? Libtool has support for IA64 AIX which
only comes in version 5 of AIX.
Robert
Gary Kumfert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've found no support for AIX 5 in automake, autoconf,
> or libtool (not even config.guess!).
>
> Any libtool developer interested in teaming up to add
> AI
Rob,
Nope. Haven't tried CVS yet. Figured someone would
let me know if AIX 5 support is already there.
What about AIX 5 on rs6000? PowerPC? Those are really
my platforms of interest at the moment.
Gary
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Robert Boehne wrote:
> Gary:
>
> Have you tried CVS? Libtool
22 matches
Mail list logo
