Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > > this will make the pro

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > > this will make the pro

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Nick Hudson
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 19:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but > > > hopefully this will make the problem a

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > this will make the problem a bit clearer: > > I already stated that the problem lies in the fa

Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts)

2001-09-12 Thread Bruce Korb
Tim Mooney wrote: > Something similar to what's done on page 147 (section 6.7) of K&R2e -- K&R2e == ANSI > Of course, most of the functions still use the K&R style arg definitions. K&R1e. > Maybe it should be switched to using ANSI only, and people should be advised > to use `ansi2knr' if the

Re: libtool RFE

2001-09-12 Thread Bruce Korb
Guido Draheim wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:14:42PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > > > It seems I need to be able to build both 32 and 64 bit > > > libraries. Since nobody seems to have anything to do, > > > maybe we can add this to our copious spare time act

Re: make check failures

2001-09-12 Thread Assar Westerlund
Nick Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. I am now seeing the same thing and the reason is that the configure > stuff for libltdl doesn't expect dlopen to exist in libc - it is > expecting it in libdl or libsvld. Parts of the configure output are > below.. The simple fix below (relative to cv