On Tuesday 11 September 2001 19:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but
> > > hopefully this will make the problem a bit clearer:
> >
> > I already stated that the problem lies in the fact that the configuration
> > goop expects dlopen to be in a library other than libc for libltdl. This
> > is plain wrong on NetBSD and probably other BSD derivatives.
>
> Fixed in 1.4.2:
>
> 2001-09-03 Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * ltdl.m4 [AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS]: Teach ltdl about the
> behavior of OpenBSD's dlopen().
This change has nothing to do with *Net*BSD or indeed the problem I'm not
describing very well.
So, here goes again...
In ltdl.c the following code exists
--- cut here ---
#if HAVE_LIBDL && !defined(__CYGWIN__)
errors += lt_dlloader_add (lt_dlloader_next (0), &sys_dl, "dlopen");
#endif
#if HAVE_SHL_LOAD
errors += lt_dlloader_add (lt_dlloader_next (0), &sys_shl, "dlopen");
#endif
#ifdef __WINDOWS__
errors += lt_dlloader_add (lt_dlloader_next (0), &sys_wll, "dlopen");
#endif
#ifdef __BEOS__
errors += lt_dlloader_add (lt_dlloader_next (0), &sys_bedl, "dlopen");
#endif
#if HAVE_DLD
errors += lt_dlloader_add (lt_dlloader_next (0), &sys_dld, "dld");
#endif
errors += lt_dlloader_add (lt_dlloader_next (0), &presym, "dlpreload");
-- cut here ---
For NetBSD non of HAVE_LIBDL, HAVE_SHL_LOAD, HAVE_DLD are true and so
"dlopen" doesn't get added as a loader.
dlopen does exist. It just exists in libc and not libdl.
Nick
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
