G'day Bruce:
I think it would help you envision a solution in Libtool to
look at what gcc builds currently do. I'm sure the gcc guys
would like it if Libtool could handle all of the multilib
combinations for them (or would they?).
HTH
Robert
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> > For the question asked, it would simply
> > fork into a 32bit and 64bit build-subdir, let `configure` create
> > different makefiles with slightly different options to be passed
> > to libtool, and then `make` each of them seperatl
Guido Draheim wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:14:42PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > > It seems I need to be able to build both 32 and 64 bit
> > > libraries. Since nobody seems to have anything to do,
> > > maybe we can add this to our copious spare time act
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 04:26:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: libtool RFE
> > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:05:17 -0500
>
> > Are you
> > aware of any OS that supports 32 and 64-bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:14:42PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > It seems I need to be able to build both 32 and 64 bit
> > libraries. Since nobody seems to have anything to do,
> > maybe we can add this to our copious spare time activities:
> >
> > Construction of mu
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: libtool RFE
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:05:17 -0500
> Are you
> aware of any OS that supports 32 and 64-bit libraries in the same
> directory? I know Solaris and AIX don't do this.
The libraries th
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:14:42PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> It seems I need to be able to build both 32 and 64 bit
> libraries. Since nobody seems to have anything to do,
> maybe we can add this to our copious spare time activities:
>
> Construction of multiple output libraries based on more
>
It seems I need to be able to build both 32 and 64 bit
libraries. Since nobody seems to have anything to do,
maybe we can add this to our copious spare time activities:
Construction of multiple output libraries based on more
than just the -PIC compiler flags. viz., the
``-xarch=v9 -xregs=no%ap
