G'day Bruce:
I think it would help you envision a solution in Libtool to
look at what gcc builds currently do. I'm sure the gcc guys
would like it if Libtool could handle all of the multilib
combinations for them (or would they?).
HTH
Robert
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> >
> > > For the question asked, it would simply
> > > fork into a 32bit and 64bit build-subdir, let `configure` create
> > > different makefiles with slightly different options to be passed
> > > to libtool, and then `make` each of them seperatly but in the same
> > > go and therefore possibly in parallel. And again - I've done this
> > > and it works, and I guess for quite a few platforms it would be
> > > great if the autotools could provide us with good support for it.
> >
> > Yeah. There it is. That is a better articulation of what I
> > was asking for :-).
>
> There is mention of multilib support in the TODO files of Libtool IIRC.
> As I understand it, this is a generalisation of the same problem...
> patches gratefully accepted ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Gary.
> --
> ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
> ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
> / )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
> `(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
