Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-14 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: ... > HAVE_LIBDL is a misnomer, and should perhaps be renamed to > HAVE_DLOPEN, since the additon of a library that contains dlopen is > handled separately. Good idea :) Patrick ___ Lib

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-14 Thread Nick Hudson
On Thursday 13 September 2001 21:30, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 07:31:41PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 September 2001 19:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: [...] > > > * ltdl.m4 [AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS]: Teach ltdl about the > > > behavior of OpenBSD's dlopen(

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-13 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 07:31:41PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > On Tuesday 11 September 2001 19:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends f

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > this will make the problem a bit clearer: > > I already stated that the problem lies in the fa

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Nick Hudson
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 19:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but > > > hopefully this will make the problem a

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > > this will make the pro

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > > this will make the pro

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-11 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > > this will make the problem a bit clearer: > > I already stated that the problem lies in the fa

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-10 Thread Nick Hudson
On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: > I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully > this will make the problem a bit clearer: I already stated that the problem lies in the fact that the configuration goop expects dlopen to be in a library other