Re: Problem with LT 1.5.12: -pthread

2005-02-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lots of people wrote: | On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Jeff Squyres wrote: | |> I would clearly vote for it. :D Okay, first note that the problem is that libtool-1.5.12 does not pass on - -pthread to the compiler/linker when building executables, it does pass it

Re: Problem with LT 1.5.12: -pthread

2005-02-07 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Jeff Squyres wrote: I would clearly vote for it. :D I think that any project that uses AM+LT for compiling multi-threaded applications that uses any of those flags will fail to link properly, right? And these flags (-pthread, -mt, etc.) are typically the recommended method of

Re: Problem with LT 1.5.12: -pthread

2005-02-07 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Jeff Squyres wrote: I think that any project that uses AM+LT for compiling multi-threaded applications that uses any of those flags will fail to link properly, right? And these flags (-pthread, -mt, etc.) are typically the recommended method of compiling / linking multi-threaded applications. I

Re: Problem with LT 1.5.12: -pthread

2005-02-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
I would clearly vote for it. :D I think that any project that uses AM+LT for compiling multi-threaded applications that uses any of those flags will fail to link properly, right? And these flags (-pthread, -mt, etc.) are typically the recommended method of compiling / linking multi-threaded ap

Re: Problem with LT 1.5.12: -pthread

2005-02-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Squyres wrote: | | From here, I get lots of [expected] messages about missing pthread | symbols. This is somewhat of a Big Problem; it did not happen with | 1.5.10 -- meaning that -pthead was passed down to the final link in | (ditto for LT <1.5.