Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-29 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2004-01-29T10:36-, Scott James Remnant wrote: ) On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 01:35, Daniel Reed wrote: ) > The problem I was reporting is not so much the testing for C++ as it was the ) > failing of ./configure if a C++ preprocessor was not available. There is C ) > code in the various examples dir

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-29 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:00, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Scott James Remnant wrote: > > | That's actually an Autoconf macro that's failing, unfortunately. It's > | an irritant, but I've not figured out a way of getting around it short > | of overriding AC_MSG_ERROR. > > Well, we already know the res

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-29 Thread Earnie Boyd
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Autoconf now performs two levels of header tests. One level is to check that the header file exists, while the other is to ensure that it can be entirely preprocessed correctly. Probably /lib/cpp is used because it is more work to figure out how to use the compiler as a pre

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scott James Remnant wrote: | That's actually an Autoconf macro that's failing, unfortunately. It's | an irritant, but I've not figured out a way of getting around it short | of overriding AC_MSG_ERROR. Well, we already know the results of AC_PROG_CPP,

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-29 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 01:35, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2004-01-28T15:59-, Scott James Remnant wrote: > ) On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:15, Daniel Reed wrote: > ) > Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool, > ) > would it be possible for the next release of libtool to

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-28 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2004-01-28T15:59-, Scott James Remnant wrote: ) On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:15, Daniel Reed wrote: ) > Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool, ) > would it be possible for the next release of libtool to not: ) There isn't any C code either ... it checks for va

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-28 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> [config.log] > >> configure:5791: /lib/cpp conftest.cc > >> cpp: conftest.cc: C++ compiler not installed on this system > >> configure:5797: $? = 1 > >> configure: failed program was: > > > > In my opi

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [config.log] >> configure:5791: /lib/cpp conftest.cc >> cpp: conftest.cc: C++ compiler not installed on this system >> configure:5797: $? = 1 >> configure: failed program was: > > In my opinion, this is the most grevious existing libtool bug. The >

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-28 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2004-01-25T14:47-, Scott James Remnant wrote: > ) The Libtool Team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Libtool > ) 1.5.2. > > Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool, > would it be possible for the next releas

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-28 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:15, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2004-01-25T14:47-, Scott James Remnant wrote: > ) The Libtool Team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Libtool > ) 1.5.2. > > Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool, > would it be possible for the ne

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-28 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2004-01-25T14:47-, Scott James Remnant wrote: ) The Libtool Team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Libtool ) 1.5.2. Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool, would it be possible for the next release of libtool to not: checking whether ln -s works..

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-27 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 23:30, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.5-1.5.2.diff.gz > > This doesn't seem to have the changes to the generated files, > therefore requiring a re-autoconf etc. I think a diff is normally

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-26 Thread Kevin Ryde
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.5-1.5.2.diff.gz This doesn't seem to have the changes to the generated files, therefore requiring a re-autoconf etc. I think a diff is normally meant to be between the .tar files of the respective versio

Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

2004-01-26 Thread Znamenáček Milan
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:47:53 +, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Libtool Team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Libtool 1.5.2. GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, whic