On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 08:52:55PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good to me. In order to not penalise IRIX developers, I guess
> > libtool should continue to discard -LANG:foo and friends, except on
> > IRIX. That would make it safe t
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 12:09:14AM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 05:26:39PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Aug 25, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >>
> > >> A pragmatic approach might be:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me. In order to not penalise IRIX developers, I guess
> libtool should continue to discard -LANG:foo and friends, except on
> IRIX. That would make it safe to add the following to your Makefile.am:
>
> libfoo_la_LIBADD = -LAN
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 05:26:39PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >>
> >> A pragmatic approach might be:
> >>
> >> case $arg in
> >> .
> >> -LANG:*) continue ;;
> >> -L*)
>
> >
On Aug 25, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
>> A pragmatic approach might be:
>>
>> case $arg in
>> .
>> -LANG:*) continue ;;
>> -L*)
> Yep, although I've done the ANG: case in -L conditionalized on $host
> beeing *-*-irix. No
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> A pragmatic approach might be:
>
> case $arg in
> .
> -LANG:*) continue ;;
> -L*)
Yep, although I've done the ANG: case in -L conditionalized on $host
beeing *-*-irix. Note also, that SGI's CC also recognizes -LIST: and
-LNO:. They mu
On Aug 25, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In principle this seems like a good idea... but is libtool ever going
> to have to deal with `libANG:whatever.la'??
Or ANG:foo/bar? Well, since this can't be used portably, there's not
much point in our trying to support it on any
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 12:49:29AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> If libtool understood -LANG:std, one less thing for the authors to
> >> deal with.
>
> > Yep, I also like this solution most, even if this means a very special
> > c
On Aug 24, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If libtool understood -LANG:std, one less thing for the authors to
>> deal with.
> Yep, I also like this solution most, even if this means a very special
> case in ltmain.
Maybe we shouldn't make it a special case. How about creating
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Albert Chin-A-Young wrote:
> > > > Ok, thanks. However, this raises another problem.
> > > > CXXFLAGS="-Wc,-LANG:std" won't work as the configure tests to make
> > > > sure CC works will fail.
> > >
> > > You'd have to add this flag to LDFLAGS (since it's only to be used
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 12:48:30AM -0500, Albert Chin-A-Young wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:36:52AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On May 3, 2000, Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, thanks. However, this raises another problem.
> > > CXXFLAGS="-Wc,-LANG:std" wo
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:36:52AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 3, 2000, Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, thanks. However, this raises another problem.
> > CXXFLAGS="-Wc,-LANG:std" won't work as the configure tests to make
> > sure CC works will fail.
>
> You'd
On May 3, 2000, Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks. However, this raises another problem.
> CXXFLAGS="-Wc,-LANG:std" won't work as the configure tests to make
> sure CC works will fail.
You'd have to add this flag to LDFLAGS (since it's only to be used at
link time; at
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:51AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 3, 2000, Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:10:32PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 09:53:42AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> >> This is a known p
On May 3, 2000, Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:10:32PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 09:53:42AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> This is a known problem with a workaround: when building the libtool
>> compile line, you sho
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:10:32PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 09:53:42AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > The IRIX C/C++ compiler accepts aguments of the form "-LANG:std".
> > Options of this form must be specified in order to compile and link
> > C++ code, and possib
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 09:53:42AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The IRIX C/C++ compiler accepts aguments of the form "-LANG:std".
> Options of this form must be specified in order to compile and link
> C++ code, and possibly strict ANSI code. Unfortunately, libtool
> parses these options as be
The IRIX C/C++ compiler accepts aguments of the form "-LANG:std".
Options of this form must be specified in order to compile and link
C++ code, and possibly strict ANSI code. Unfortunately, libtool
parses these options as being linker path options and does not supply
them properly to the compiler
18 matches
Mail list logo
