Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-18 Thread Bruce Korb
Robert Boehne wrote: > Can we get around these problems easier in the binary-branch? Not for a while. First, we have to settle out all the fixes that went into the mainline, but not MLB. (binary is MLB-current). > I envision a binary libtool that could do all of the processing > itself, withou

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-18 Thread Robert Boehne
Bruce Korb wrote: > > Robert Boehne wrote: > > Can we get around these problems easier in the binary-branch? > > Not for a while. First, we have to settle out all the fixes that > went into the mainline, but not MLB. (binary is MLB-current). > > > I envision a binary libtool that could do all

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-17 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 17, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we get around these problems easier in the binary-branch? I'm not sure it's going to be easier, but it's hopefully going to be far more efficient :-) > I envision a binary libtool that could do all of the processing > itself, witho

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-17 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 17 May 2001 5:49 pm, Robert Boehne wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On May 9, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So the problem seems to be that when relink_command is formed, > > > it's passed through bug-ridden vendor sed. If there is another way > > > to buil

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Boehne
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On May 9, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So the problem seems to be that when relink_command is formed, > > it's passed through bug-ridden vendor sed. If there is another way > > to build $relink_command without running into this problem, I'd >

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-11 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 9, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the problem seems to be that when relink_command is formed, > it's passed through bug-ridden vendor sed. If there is another way > to build $relink_command without running into this problem, I'd > like to hear suggestions. :) One a

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-09 Thread Robert Boehne
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Monday 07 May 2001 8:13 pm, Robert Boehne wrote: > > Can I simply not allow relink_commands to be put into > > lib*.la when piecewise linking is used, or will this have > > other side effects I'm not aware of? > > I expext that it would break --fast-install-mode,

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-07 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 07 May 2001 8:13 pm, Robert Boehne wrote: > Can I simply not allow relink_commands to be put into > lib*.la when piecewise linking is used, or will this have > other side effects I'm not aware of? I expext that it would break --fast-install-mode, and possibly normal linking on archite

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-07 Thread Robert Boehne
Question: Can I simply not allow relink_commands to be put into lib*.la when piecewise linking is used, or will this have other side effects I'm not aware of? Robert Robert Boehne wrote: > > Hello all, > > I wanted to let everyone know that I've found a problem when > mode=install with piece

[MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-07 Thread Robert Boehne
Hello all, I wanted to let everyone know that I've found a problem when mode=install with piecewise linking. It appears that the "right" command is getting truncated when it's too long. That causes the library to get created, but missing some of the object files that are supposed to go into it.