That's great news. I cannot, however, promise to have these available
anytime
soon. I would appreciate help. Anyone?
I can certainly help out with this. While waiting for more input on
this thread, I actually ended up coming up with the same solution last
night. I woke up this morning to find
On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 am, David wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > Feel free to take the patches from NetBSD pkgsrc and makes noises with
> > the KDE people. http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/software/packages.html
> >
> No need to make noise with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
>Feel free to take the patches from NetBSD pkgsrc and makes noises with
the KDE
people. http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/software/packages.html
No need to make noise with the KDE people, I am reading this list
*grins* If you have a patch a
Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:44 PM, Guido Draheim wrote:
You mean they are listed as ".la" on the link-line?
To stick with the example, there is a
LIB_KDEGAMES = libkdegames.la
in your makefiles? aargh, kde maniacs at work
No, it would be, libfoo_la_LIBADD
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:44 PM, Guido Draheim wrote:
You mean they are listed as ".la" on the link-line?
To stick with the example, there is a
LIB_KDEGAMES = libkdegames.la
in your makefiles? aargh, kde maniacs at work
No, it would be, libfoo_la_LIBADD =
$(top_builddir)/kdec
Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:17 PM, Guido Draheim wrote:
That's actually the difference between "-all-static" and "-static" IIRC.
The "-static" should only link its .la's as static, and non-la's dynamic.
But perhaps I am mistaken too, that's why I did ask if you did
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:17 PM, Guido Draheim wrote:
That's actually the difference between "-all-static" and "-static"
IIRC.
The "-static" should only link its .la's as static, and non-la's
dynamic.
But perhaps I am mistaken too, that's why I did ask if you did try
somewhen.
Well,
