On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:44 PM, Guido Draheim wrote:
No, it would be, libfoo_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/kdecore/libkdecore.laYou mean they are listed as ".la" on the link-line?To stick with the example, there is a LIB_KDEGAMES = libkdegames.la in your makefiles? aargh, kde maniacs at work....
How else would you link against a library that's not installed yet?
Seems like no matter how "correct" it is, you'd be breaking (depending on your definition of breaking =) 95% of the platforms that it works on, just for the 5% where it doesn't...Well, anyways, as in the other subthread: may be we'd instruct all -module .la to be linked as .a, on all platforms, and leave all the other .la be dynalinked. That would help here, and from my POV not be incorrect on other platforms either. Hey, I may be wrong, so what do others think?
We're already used to working around the linker and ld.so (well, dyld) on darwin, since it's just plain odd. Seems silly to make modules unloadable on elf platforms just for us, when, to me, loading modules is a feature. It just happens to be a feature I don't have on Darwin. <g>
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
