Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Rex Dieter wrote on Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:44:42PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > * Rex Dieter wrote on Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:04:35PM CEST: >> >> Albert Chin wrote: >> >> >> >> > And how do you handle

Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello, > > * Rex Dieter wrote on Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:04:35PM CEST: >> Albert Chin wrote: >> >> > And how do you handle the inherited_linker_flags variable in .la files? >> >> Dunno, but hopefully implementation detail

Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

Albert Chin wrote: > And how do you handle the inherited_linker_flags variable in .la files? Dunno, but hopefully implementation details can be overcome (by guru's with ample libtool-fu). Either libtool needs to address the issues raised in this thread, or distros will start/continue to simply o

Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

Albert Chin wrote: > And, even for .pc files, it doesn't mean you get _only_ the libraries > you need. What if someone has "Requires: -lpng -lz" in a .pc file? > Then you have a dependency on libpng and libz, which is unnecessary as > libpng already depends on libz. If the "Requires" is legit, wh