Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Rex Dieter wrote on Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:44:42PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > * Rex Dieter wrote on Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:04:35PM CEST: >> >> Albert Chin wrote: >> >> >> >> > And how do you handle the inherited_linker_flags variable in .la >> >> > files? >> >> >> >> Dunno, but hopefully implementation details can be overcome (by guru's >> >> with ample libtool-fu). >> > >> > There is a difference between an implementation detail and a sound set >> > of semantics. >> >> What else needs to be done except for implementation? > > For example: answer the question that Albert asked. It is not (purely) > a question of implementation. But it is by far one of the easiest > questions to answer.
Dunno, my libtool-fu is lacking, which was why I hoped someone more qualified than I could tackle this. >> Is there not agreement that this is a good approach to address the >> issues raised? If not, I hadn't read any responses in this thread >> saying so. > If you only want to solve the problem for GNU/Linux systems (more > precisely: for systems with GNU binutils ld and a glibc ld.so), then > the issue becomes much simpler. This is *exactly* what I'm suggesting: drop/omit the hackage on platforms that don't need it (and GNU binutils/glibc is one of them). -- Rex _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
