On 02/06/2015 02:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It is curious that there is more impact for the optimized builds.
Well, it's a constant 5s impact for both optimized and non-optimized -
except for v2.4.3 which looks odd.
Cheers,
--
Peter Johansson
_
On 02/06/2015 12:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I am not seeing quite the difference between libtool releases that you are
although I see a big slowdown starting with 2.4.3. These timings are for
optimized builds of GraphicsMagick on a 12-core GNU/Linux system using -j 12:
I think that we can
I am not seeing quite the difference between libtool releases that you
are although I see a big slowdown starting with 2.4.3. These timings
are for optimized builds of GraphicsMagick on a 12-core GNU/Linux
system using -j 12:
2.4.2 : 23.613
2.4.3 : 31.697
2.4.4 : 28.236
2.4.5 : 28.514
And he
Hello,
After removing the two lines, libtool 2.4.5 is a little slower than 2.4.2
when using /bin/dash, but it is much slower than in bash, here is the
data when compile xz: (make -j1)
lt-2.4.2 lt-2.4.5(before patched) lt-2.4.5(after patched)
dash 11s 21s
Jim,
Click the link at the bottom of every message from the list and follow the
instructions for unsubscribe on the page it takes you to.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
> On 5 Feb 2015, at 12:32, James Smith wrote:
>
> Please could somebody let me know how to get off this
Please could somebody let me know how to get off this mailing list. I don't
understand what is going on, I have never asked to on the list and frankly
don't care as I find it quite frustrating.
Jim Smith.
On 4 Feb 2015, at 23:53, Ying Liu wrote:
> When I built program using libtool, I got ma
