Hello,
After removing the two lines, libtool 2.4.5 is a little slower than 2.4.2
when using /bin/dash, but it is much slower than in bash, here is the
data when compile xz: (make -j1)
lt-2.4.2 lt-2.4.5(before patched) lt-2.4.5(after patched)
dash 11s 21s 13s
bash 13s 30s 21s
We can see that dash is much faster than bash. (note, the data I had reported
before for lt-2.4.5 after patched is 11s, but today is 13s, I think that
it is because of the free disk space, the data is very stable in each day,
I tried them several times).
// Robert
On 02/04/2015 10:56 PM, Robert Yang wrote:
On 02/04/2015 10:48 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Robert Yang wrote:
When reporting a bug, please describe a test case to reproduce it and
include the following information:
host-triplet: $host
shell: $SHELL
compiler: $LTCC
compiler flags: $LTCFLAGS
linker: $LD (gnu? $with_gnu_ld)
version: $progname (GNU libtool) 2.4.5
automake: `($AUTOMAKE --version) 2>/dev/null |$SED 1q`
autoconf: `($AUTOCONF --version) 2>/dev/null |$SED 1q`
Perhaps libtool is accidentially executing 'automake --version' and 'autoconf
--version' every time it is executed? That would certainly lead to a huge
slowdown.
Thanks, yes, you are right, after remove the two lines, the time is the
same as remove the whole block (11s).
// Robert
Bob
_______________________________________________
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
_______________________________________________
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
