Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I gave up on git-cvsimport a while ago, since it was so slow
> compared to parsecvs, but mainly because it would actually *reverse*
> revisions some time. E.g., it would sometimes put CVS version 1.2
> before 1.1.
That's a cvsps problem, not specific to
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:53:23AM CEST:
>> I'm beginning to think that our time might be better spent
>> investigating an alternate conversion method: cvs2git.
>> Unfortunately, I might not have time for that right away.
>
> Are the
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:53:23AM CEST:
> I'm beginning to think that our time might be better spent
> investigating an alternate conversion method: cvs2git.
> Unfortunately, I might not have time for that right away.
Are there known deficiencies of git cvsimport?
(I
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
This improvement is almost entirely due to Ralf, so I encourage everyone
who is subscribed to this list to seek him out and buy him many beers.
Please take care not to buy Ralf too many beers at once since then his
productivity may decrease. Spread
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> libtool 1.5.26:
> real 4:53.877
> user 3:26.912
> sys 1:25.275
>
> libtool 1.2965 2008-04-22 (bash)
> real 4:03.745
> user 3:19.232
> sys41.018
Bob, thank you for testing and giving us these numbers.
This improvement is almost entirely due
