Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:53:23AM CEST: >> I'm beginning to think that our time might be better spent >> investigating an alternate conversion method: cvs2git. >> Unfortunately, I might not have time for that right away. > > Are there known deficiencies of git cvsimport?
Hi Ralf, I gave up on git-cvsimport a while ago, since it was so slow compared to parsecvs, but mainly because it would actually *reverse* revisions some time. E.g., it would sometimes put CVS version 1.2 before 1.1. > (I haven't tried either yet, just trying to avoid > work that may be known to be in vain.) > Or is that because both use cvsps? At least that one was a cvsps problem. I'll try to find time to test cvs2git RSN. _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
