C flags and headers in a C library

2007-05-01 Thread Joseph Wakeling
Hello, I'm a novice user of the GNU autotools trying to create the appropriate configuration for a small simulation library I'm writing, called Minga. >From web tutorials, and examining configure.ac and Makefile.am files in other free software projects, I've been able to put together something th

Re: dll names on windows

2007-05-01 Thread Bob Rossi
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Bob, Max, all, > > * Bob Rossi wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:26:25AM CEST: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > > > Is there any way that I can have libtool simply create a dll with the >

Re: Making shared libraries (DLLs) on Windows: -no-undefined

2007-05-01 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, John Brown wrote: > I gather that on Linux, you *can* create a shared library with undefined > symbols. Indeed. > 1) Why would anyone do that intentionally? To link against another library, or to import a symbol defined by the main program or a library loaded by the main program before. T

Re: dll names on windows

2007-05-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bob, Max, all, * Bob Rossi wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:26:25AM CEST: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > Is there any way that I can have libtool simply create a dll with the > > new 'pcre.dll' instead of 'libpcre-0.dll'? Otherwise, I'll have to code >

Re: Making shared libraries (DLLs) on Windows: -no-undefined

2007-05-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:40:40PM CEST: > Brian Dessent wrote: > >So yes, you need to either use -no-undefined unconditionally, or > >conditionalized on PE targets. > > What's the point of doing this only on PE targets? Surely the library > will either have undefined