On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Bob, Max, all, > > * Bob Rossi wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:26:25AM CEST: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > > > Is there any way that I can have libtool simply create a dll with the > > > new 'pcre.dll' instead of 'libpcre-0.dll'? Otherwise, I'll have to code > > > into the Makefile some commands to provide the user with what they want. > > I think you may be able to hack^Wworkaround like this: > lib_LTLIBRARIES = pcre.la > pcre_la_SOURCES = ... > pcre_la_LDFLAGS = -module
Brain Dessent said I could try the '-avoid-version' switch. It seems to work. Does that sound good to you? > Another possibility is to manually copy the file after installation. Hmm, I hadn't even thought of that. I wasn't sure if copying dll's worked. That is, I thought maybe the name of the dll was embedded in it somehow. > > Ping. Maybe this is a stupid question. I'm not really knowledgeable > > enough to know if what I'm asking for doesn't even make sense. I'd like > > to at least find out if it's a reasonable question that I'm asking. :) > > Sorry for the delay. Nonsense! Thanks for the help! Bob Rossi _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
