Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

2006-10-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Rex Dieter wrote on Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:20:59PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > If you only want to solve the problem for GNU/Linux systems (more > > precisely: for systems with GNU binutils ld and a glibc ld.so), then > > the issue becomes much simpler. > > This is *exactly* what I

Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

2006-10-23 Thread Rex Dieter
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Rex Dieter wrote on Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:44:42PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > * Rex Dieter wrote on Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:04:35PM CEST: >> >> Albert Chin wrote: >> >> >> >> > And how do you handle the inherited_linker_flags variable in .la >> >> > files? >>

Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

2006-10-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Rex Dieter wrote on Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:44:42PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Rex Dieter wrote on Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:04:35PM CEST: > >> Albert Chin wrote: > >> > >> > And how do you handle the inherited_linker_flags variable in .la files? > >> > >> Dunno, but hopefully implement

Re: Splitting dependency_libs in *.la?

2006-10-23 Thread Rex Dieter
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello, > > * Rex Dieter wrote on Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:04:35PM CEST: >> Albert Chin wrote: >> >> > And how do you handle the inherited_linker_flags variable in .la files? >> >> Dunno, but hopefully implementation details can be overcome (by guru's >> with ample libtoo

Autoconf test version 2.60b available

2006-10-23 Thread Paul Eggert
We're happy to announce the release of Autoconf 2.60b. This is a test version. It is mostly a bug-fix release since 2.60. We hope to generate Autoconf 2.61 soon, based on feedback from this test version. The important changes since Autoconf 2.60a are listed below. The sources and GPG detached