I found that freebsd is hacking all the ltmain.sh-es to get
roughly the same behavior that netbsd is already getting.
Any objections to putting something along these lines into
ltmain.in? (Obviously changing /usr/bin/false to something
conditional on not being freebsd.)
> --- config/ltmain.sh.o
Richard,
I didn't see any errors in the output you sent, did
you forget somthing?
Robert
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Robert Boehne wrote:
>I didn't see any errors in the output you sent, did
>you forget somthing?
>
Well, no error message came up, but the shared library file doesn't get
installed in the proper directory. After compiling, I would find a
lib.la file in the .libs subdirectory, but when I execute
>>> "Stephano" == Stephano Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephano> libltdl (current from CVS) seems not to return NULL
Stephano> when lt_dlopen is passed the name of a non-existent
Stephano> file.
I got the same error and sent this patch:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/libtool-patches/20
I have seem plenty of discussions about the proper use of the test functions
in libtool. What is the status of this problem, is it completely fixed in
libtool 1.4.2 and/or 1.4d? Is it only up to app developpers now?
I'm asking because I tried compiling pkg-config-0.12.0 over the weekend on a
Sola
Title: Low Cost Life Insurance
Now it's easier to provide for your Loved Ones:
SAVE UP TO 75% ON YOUR TERM LIFE INSURANCE
Lowest Rates from the Best Insurance Companies Nationwide!
Compare your rates in less than a minute:
1. get your FREE instant quo
