Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-14 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 13, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:42:44AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> I won't bother to post a revised patch. Ok to install? > Huh? Okay to install what? =)O| A patch I had posted to binutils only, that fixes the old libtool versi

Re: Getting the platforms DLL name ending ?

2000-03-14 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 04:32:19PM +0800, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > What is the easiest way to get the current platforms DLL name ending? > I want a string containing .so on Linux .sl on HP/UX and .dll on OS/2. > > I tried reading ltmain.sh, ltconfig and libtool without discovering > any me

Re: towards libtool 1.4 (was: Preserve environment variables for rel

2000-03-14 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:15:59PM +0100, Thomas Tanner wrote: > > On 13-Mar-2000 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > >> This might be worth back-porting to 1.3.*, in case we decide to > >> release 1.3.5. What do you think? > > Nah. I think we should make a 1.4 branch and make a release from that > > so t

RE: Extra library dependencies?

2000-03-14 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Thomas Tanner wrote: > > On 27-Feb-2000 Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > I am encountering a very strange problem when using CVS libtool > > (multi-lingual) in that several libraries are repeated (as reported by > > ldd) as dependencies, and these libraries are not found at run-ti

RE: Extra library dependencies?

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Tanner
On 27-Feb-2000 Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > I am encountering a very strange problem when using CVS libtool > (multi-lingual) in that several libraries are repeated (as reported by > ldd) as dependencies, and these libraries are not found at run-time. > This is under Solaris 2.6, using gcc 2.9.5. >

towards libtool 1.4 (was: Preserve environment variables for rel

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Tanner
On 13-Mar-2000 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> This might be worth back-porting to 1.3.*, in case we decide to >> release 1.3.5. What do you think? > Nah. I think we should make a 1.4 branch and make a release from that > so that we can merge Ossama's branch back into the trunk. I think it doesn't

RE: Getting the platforms DLL name ending ?

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Tanner
On 14-Mar-2000 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > What is the easiest way to get the current platforms DLL name ending? > I want a string containing .so on Linux .sl on HP/UX and .dll on OS/2. > > I tried reading ltmain.sh, ltconfig and libtool without discovering > any method to get this informati

Getting the platforms DLL name ending ?

2000-03-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
What is the easiest way to get the current platforms DLL name ending? I want a string containing .so on Linux .sl on HP/UX and .dll on OS/2. I tried reading ltmain.sh, ltconfig and libtool without discovering any method to get this information. -- ##> Petter Reinholdtsen <##| [EMAIL PROTEC