[Libreoffice] Extension oooblogger.oxt removed from master ?

Hi all, Is just my potentially screwed up repo, or has the oooblogger.oxt extension been removed from master ? I see a commit in the arch-linux/trunk from May 3rd, where it seems that it was removed from the build, hoping that this change wasn't pushed to the libo master... Alex __

Re: [Libreoffice] Extension oooblogger.oxt removed from master ?

Le 10/05/11 12:22, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : So I grepped, but am at a loss to understand what happened, other than that the extension appears to have been deactivated in some of the distro-config files, and yet it is still listed as an extension in scp2 : git grep oooblogger configure.in:AC_

Re: [Libreoffice] Extension oooblogger.oxt removed from master ?

Le 10/05/11 12:22, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : > I see a commit in the arch-linux/trunk from May 3rd, where it seems that > it was removed from the build, hoping that this change wasn't pushed to > the libo master... Or alternatively, if it was deliberately removed, then the corresponding switch

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Noel Power changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36991 --- Comment #93 from Noel Power 2011

[Libreoffice] vector-ising conversion patches ...

Hi Joseph, I'm looking at my 3rd bug in a row that seems to come from under-tested commits to convert tools/ types to boost / std container types. In this case: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36340 ( but I'm working on it ;-) It would be wonderful i

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Some more OSL_* love and debug.hxx removal in writer/sw

Hi, Attached hereto are 3 patches: - 0001 replaces #ifdef DEBUG with #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1 - 0002 removes unused (most probably) debug function from acccontext.cxx - 0003 removes debug.hxx includes from several files in writer/sw. There are stil a few debug.hxx left as there are some macros from

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Volker Merschmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Volker Merschmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #28 from Volker M

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] report

Hi everyone, I've tried to move res/commandimagelist to /cmd and create symlinks commandimagelist to ../cmd but it is not working. After small change in packimages/pack/makefile.mk:56 $(FIND) $(SOLARSRC)$/$(RSCDEFIMG)/res/commandimagelist -name "*.png" changed to: $(FIND) $(SOLARSRC)$/$(RSCDEFIMG

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36957, which changed state. Bug 36957 Summary: EDITING: Insert TOC – Edit – Writer crashes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36957 What|Old Value |New Value ---

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] File systems "style" cleaning in libs-gui

On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 05:41:21PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > The attached patch removes most of the obsolete file system-related enums > in libs-gui and keeps only two "styles": > - NTFS for the Windows NT family of operating systems > - BSD Unix for all the rest Pushed to master. -- Franc

Re: [Libreoffice] REVIEW: vector regression ...

Michael Meeks píše v Po 09. 05. 2011 v 21:45 +0100: > I'd like to get this into libreoffice-3-4 - please double check for > this sort of snafu, with OOB indexes now crashing where previously they > returned null :-) > > It fixes half of the testtool startup problem. The change looks f

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] report

Hi Matus, On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:32 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > I've tried to move res/commandimagelist to /cmd and create symlinks > commandimagelist to ../cmd but it is not working. :-) > After small change in packimages/pack/makefile.mk:56 .. > because first find now lists just the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#36933

On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 10:43 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 23:09 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I'd like to have the attached patch committed for 3.4. It fixes > > Works fine for me on master; I've cherry picked it for you. > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.

[Libreoffice] valgrind on Mac ...

Hi Norbert, Julian tells me that valgrind works nicely on Mac; I was wondering - do you use it routinely ? and/or how valrind-clean are we for a startup / exit in the various components ? it'd be nice to see if there are any nasties in the underlying OS integration to fix there. A

[Libreoffice] [PATCH][REVIEW] Fix for fdo#36673: corrupt date formats of cells

Brothers & sisters in LibO :) Can some1 please review the attached patch? It fixes fdo#36673 (one of the most annoying ones), which is a regression from 3.3. Some data in cells formatted using certain date formats are lost, since the default date format is used instead. The issue affects all lo

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

Thanks for your thoughts Norbert. On 2011-05-09, at 7:46 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: >> Hi Christian: > [...] >> >> Precisely. So maybe the time is now to start up an Xcode IDE version. > > That is very unlikely. when we move to 10.6 that wil

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36482 --- Comment #94 from Rainer Bie

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Noel Power changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37045 --- Comment #95 from Noel Power 2011

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #96 from Noel Power 2011-05-10 11:06:05 PDT --- valgrind says ==1706== Invalid read of size 1 ==1706==at 0x1EC41058: SwViewImp::SetFirstVisPageInvalid() (viewimp.hxx:186) ==1706==by 0x1EF750D3: ViewShell::SetFirstVisPageInv

[Libreoffice] Mac dependencies needed - Yes or No?

This wiki says to install Mac dependencies: This e-mail from Christian says they are not needed: May 1, 2011 11:04:38 AM EDT To: Peter Teeson ... There are no dependencies other than XCode with the 10.4u SDK (it's no

[Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.5 tag created (3.4.0-beta5)

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.3.99.5 tag for 3.4.0-beta5 release. The corresponding official builds will be available by the end of the week. See the attached list of changes against 3.4.0-beta4. You might switch your current 3-4 source tree to it using: ./g fetch --tags ./g che

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac dependencies needed - Yes or No?

Hi Peter, *, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: > This wiki says to install Mac dependencies: > > This e-mail from Christian says they are not needed: > > May 1, 2011 11:04:38 AM EDT > > To: Peter Teeson

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

> One might (repeat might) be able to graft a nice GUI front end (a.k.a Xcode) > and invoke the existing build mechanism. Well, sure, yeah. An Xcode project can (from quite limited experience here, so forgive me for inaccuracies in terminology) include build steps where an arbitrary shell scrip

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug 33781 => No anti-aliasing in metafiles when anchor is "as char"

Oh, sorry! There was a problem with my webmail and the files were not delivered. Here is the small patch (only three lines to add in a file) and the test file. Do you think the patch will be included for the 3.4.0 release? Best regards, RB Le 09/05/2011 11:27, rolan...@free.fr a écrit : H

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for crasher fdo#37045

please see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37045 and the patch attached here ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=46565 ) if someone would review / cherrypick etc. for libreoffice-3.4 branch that would be nice Noel ___ Libre

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Problematic homedir check in osl_Security.cxx

Hi, I've been bitten by the assert in line 216 of osl_Security.cxx in ure CPPUNIT_ASSERT_MESSAGE( "#test comment#: getHomeDir and compare it with the info we get at the beginning.", ( sal_True == strHomeDirectory.equals( strHome ) ) && ( sal_True == bRes ) ); Basical

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] Progress Report

Hello there, Finally I made yava2python run. I only needed to download txl from http://www.txl.ca/ I've already tried to convert some files. It's not straight, and in fact, it needs quite work but, I think it makes things much easier. Thanks Michael. Btw, I've just realized I o

[Libreoffice] Compilation failed in vcl module (warning treated as errors)

Hello, I get this : Compiling: vcl/source/gdi/gdimtf.cxx /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/clone/libs-gui/vcl/source/gdi/gdimtf.cxx:296:13: error: prototype for 'MetaAction* GDIMetaFile::ReplaceAction(MetaAction*, size_t)' does not match any in class 'GDIMetaFile' ../../inc/vcl/gdimtf.hx

Re: [Libreoffice] cppunit test fails in lotuswordpro / breaks the build on Mac/PPC

Hi Rafael, *, On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Rafael Dominguez wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Christian Lohmaier >> wrote: >> > >> > does anyone have an idea on what goes wrong here? >> > [...] >> > Assertion >> > Test n

[Libreoffice] [Patch]Clean up XDatabaseRanges in VBA code

Hello Noel, with my last patch I forgot to remove all occurences of XDatabaseRanges in the vba code. I don't think that there is any use for XDatabaseRanges in the vba code, because excel only supports one db data. Regards, Markus 0001-some-cleanup-in-vba.patch Description: Binary data

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix type mismatch in GDIMetaFile member functions.

Makes member functions implementation consistent with declarations. From 208dab07e8944d5a494fbed011555b5af0587924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafael Dominguez Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:19 -0430 Subject: [PATCH] Fix type mismatch in GDIMetaFile. --- vcl/source/gdi/gdimtf.cxx |6 +++---

Re: [Libreoffice] Compilation failed in vcl module (warning treated as errors)

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:20:05PM +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: > Compiling: vcl/source/gdi/gdimtf.cxx > /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/clone/libs-gui/vcl/source/gdi/gdimtf.cxx:296:13: > > error: prototype for 'MetaAction* > GDIMetaFile::ReplaceAction(MetaAction*, size_t)' does not matc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix type mismatch in GDIMetaFile member functions.

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:54:29PM -0430, Rafael Dominguez wrote: > Makes member functions implementation consistent with declarations. Hi Rafael, > -MetaAction* GDIMetaFile::ReplaceAction( MetaAction* pAction, size_t nAction ) > +MetaAction* GDIMetaFile::ReplaceAction( MetaAction* pAction, sal

Re: [Libreoffice] valgrind on Mac ...

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Norbert, > >        Julian tells me that valgrind works nicely on Mac; Indeed. I just downloaded the lastest source tarball... ./configure/make/make install straight up, no problem and it works too :-) even cachegind > I was wondering -

[Libreoffice] Error in make fetch - checksum failure

I am starting form scratch just to see if I understand things better this time round. But make fetch had one error fetching b4cae0700aa1c2aef7eb7f345365e6f1-translate-toolkit-1.8.1.tar.bz2 % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in make fetch - checksum failure

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:32:21PM -0400, Peter Teeson wrote: > I am starting form scratch just to see if I understand things better this > time round. > But make fetch had one error > > fetching b4cae0700aa1c2aef7eb7f345365e6f1-translate-toolkit-1.8.1.tar.bz2 > % Total% Received % Xferd A

[Libreoffice] Check Out IDVC as it Reaches New Highs

I D V C is on fire and the momentum run is only starting. It could turn into a skyrocket that blows into the orbit at this pace! Did you check the news I D V C releasd on Tuesday - great start of the run! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@li

[Libreoffice] [GSOC] Regarding ./g pull -r

Hello there, I've been trying to pull the changes using ./g pull -r and got this output. Seems there are conflicts in sw module. I guess it is because of the patch I submitted earlier. Have a look at the output here http://pastebin.com/zdtYtuir And this is the output of git diff in sw module htt

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Problematic homedir check in osl_Security.cxx

> and should be simply removed. Go for it! --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] valgrind on Mac ...

On Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Hi Norbert, > > > >Julian tells me that valgrind works nicely on Mac; > > Indeed. I just downloaded the lastest source tarball... > ./configure/make/make install straight up,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Problematic homedir check in osl_Security.cxx

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:21:18AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > and should be simply removed. > > Go for it! I will certainly remove a bit more than this patch: the previous workaround commit will not be needed anymore. And maybe I should just delete this whole bunch of code. I mean: even if

[Libreoffice] Error packaging for Mac OSX from master

HI all, My main build on master seemed to complete OK, but when packaging it fails with : ERROR: The following files could not be found: ERROR: File not found: oooblogger.oxt ... cleaning the output tree ... ... removing directory /var/folders/tQ/tQqvtWX2HoWtouh-ZgKa-k+++TI/-Tmp-/ooopackaging/i_

Re: [Libreoffice] Duplicate code: SwDoc::SplitDoc

Hi, (what stands Stt for?) once again: Stt means what? The answer might help to understand what's going on in that method. It would be great; we could leave the public methods as they are now, and have a single private impl. that they call with the extra 'bool bOutline' or whatever ?

Re: [Libreoffice] Error packaging for Mac OSX from master

Hi, 2011/5/10 Alexander Thurgood : > My main build on master seemed to complete OK, but when packaging it > fails with : > > > ERROR: The following files could not be found: > ERROR: File not found: oooblogger.oxt Packager script looks for oooblogger.oxt in %COMMON_DEST%\bin%_EXT%\ (that's the bi

Re: [Libreoffice] Error packaging for Mac OSX from master

Le 10/05/11 10:31, Andras Timar a écrit : Hi Andras, > > Packager script looks for oooblogger.oxt in %COMMON_DEST%\bin%_EXT%\ > (that's the bin folder of the solver). Copy the file there, and you'll > be fine. Ah, thanks, will try that out. > > When we used the build repo, unpack script cop

[Libreoffice] REVIEW: vector regression ...

I'd like to get this into libreoffice-3-4 - please double check for this sort of snafu, with OOB indexes now crashing where previously they returned null :-) It fixes half of the testtool startup problem. >From 20c2f97b598018e1934707d7a659db9a6cc2af0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Fro

[Libreoffice] FDO#36495 - updating OOOP extension via the extension manager causes LibO to crash

Hi all, It seems that there is a problem with updating Kami's OOOP extension with the betas : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36495 I guess that this problem will ultimately be resolved by integration of Kami's stuff into the repo in future releases ? Alex ___

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36802, which changed state. Bug 36802 Summary: testtool.bin crashes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36802 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] Error packaging for Mac OSX from master

Le 10/05/11 10:31, Andras Timar a écrit : Hmm, it turns out I was wrong when I said the oxt was in the /src directory. I seemed to recall it having been downloaded, but after checking and rechecking, I can not find it anywhere in my git repo, let alone anywhere on my system !! Very strange. Runni

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37008, which changed state. Bug 37008 Summary: Staroffice-Import-filters <= 5.0 unavailable https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37008 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice not builds

Hi there, On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 08:07 +0400, Гуляев Гоша wrote: > Hello! I do recommended steps (from error output) Hokay - so a compile-time unit test is failing to run: > -- > - start unit test #1 on library ../../unxfbsdi.pro/lib

Re: [Libreoffice] What is the exact system & switches used for the x86 linux build?

Andras Timar wrote: > Why don't you use simply ./autogen.sh --with-distro=LibreOfficeMacOSX > etc.? (plus --with-num-cpus and --with-max-jobs of course) > Because that was used by default on 3.3.x - I was not aware of the changed behaviour. Adapted now. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgp6LlXFQyoFQ.pgp De

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice: C# API or other?

Hi Marc, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 19:09 -0400, Marc wrote: > I am looking for information on how to use C# (.net) to open LibreOffice > (including the interface for LibreOffice) inside of another executable > as a window. Please ask on the developer list; I've CC'd them for the reply. > S

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#36933

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 23:09 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I'd like to have the attached patch committed for 3.4. It fixes Works fine for me on master; I've cherry picked it for you. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36933 One interesting thing is that, however we ca

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 18

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 18th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-4: fixes for LO-3.4.0 release + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.3 bug fix release