Re: [Libreoffice] [EasyHack][Print current page] How to get the last active page number?

2011-03-28 Thread Jeroen van Rijn
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:33, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: > Hello all, > > I am working on the EasyHack "Print current page" ( > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks#Print_current_page ), and I > need a little help. I believe I've found out how to change the default > value: > > In PrintDial

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#32413: Add an apply button to style edit dialog in Writer

2011-03-28 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Miklos, On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 17:16 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:42:36AM +0100, Miklos Vajna > wrote: > > Ah, I didn't see it. We talked about this with Cedric and he explained > > an idea which avoids any modification in vcl, so I'm not planning to > > push this ve

[Libreoffice] subsequenttests completely moved to gbuild

2011-03-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, I moved all system tests to the new gbuild system. I started a wiki page about how to use them: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Subsequenttests I did not migrate the modules with system tests to gbuild completely, just the tests. They build stuff still with the old build s

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Rename printdlg.cxx to prndlg.cxx

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
Hi Skyler On 25/03/11 07:22, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: "vcl/source/window/printdlg.cxx" implements "vcl/inc/vcl/prndlg.hxx", so I've renamed the .cxx file so it remains consistent, yet doesn't break the API. Thanks for the patch, I don't want to sound discouraging but really I am not sure we real

[Libreoffice] Ad posters needed

2011-03-28 Thread Mark
If you are unemployed or between jobs or to supplement your existing income. We have the perfect opportunity to help you until you get back on your feet. We are looking for part time workers to help us post ads on hundreds of websites. Great compensation, job takes less than an hour a day, basic

Re: [Libreoffice] dev300m103: list of python scripts is empty (?)

2011-03-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 16:32 -0400, Clio wrote: > It seems that python scripting is not working in dev300m103 as it was > the case with LibO 3.3.0 > (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33355). (Maybe the fix is > not in 3.4 yet?) Sorry, what's your bug ? Are you reporting that in Libre

Re: [Libreoffice] Need a little help with the easyhack "Strip include guards in idl files"

2011-03-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Julien, This looks nice ! thanks for that :-) should make the IDL and the generated headers much more readable. Having said that things like: -#ifndef __com_sun_star_uno_XInterface_idl__ #include -#endif -#ifndef __com_sun_star_beans_PropertyState_idl__ #include W

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove unused DECLARE_LIST

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
thanks!! On 25/03/11 17:44, Rafael Dominguez wrote: ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list Lib

[Libreoffice] GSoC: Wizards, Java to Python conversion

2011-03-28 Thread Xisco Faulí
Dear all, I was wondering if this task is suitable for the GSoC and if there is anyone who's willing to be a mentor of it. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks#Wizards:_Java_to_Python.3F_conversion Greetings ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOf

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#34908

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
Hi Lubos On 25/03/11 18:52, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Friday 25 of March 2011, Noel Power wrote: Ewww ... class SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT IFieldmark : virtual public IMark ... class SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT ICheckboxFieldmark : virtual public IFieldmark ... IFieldmark* pFieldma

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: Remove misuse of SfxItemSet API from libs-core

2011-03-28 Thread Theo van Klaveren
Hello everyone, I've started work on removing all calls to SfxItemSet::Put(SfxPoolItem &, int which) from the code. Attached the first two patches, which contains mostly easy cases: Almost all SfxPoolItems already contained the right WhichID, so the extra argument could just be removed. But there

[Libreoffice] please discuss design issues on the design list ...

2011-03-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rafael, and Octavio, First - welcome to the project; no doubt your design insight will be appreciated on the design list: des...@libreoffice.org On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:40 -0300, Rafael Daud wrote: > I've just joined the development list, and don't have any programming > skills worth

Re: [Libreoffice] Test LibreOffice@

2011-03-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rainer, On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:01 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > please excuse me for another annoying "Test", unfortunately I have some > problems with this particular mailing list (all other ones work fine). I > can read, but not post, and sender Last I checked, we are not eve

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#34908

2011-03-28 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:21 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > Still I think there is something strange happening here Are we certain that we compiled the key method of the class (I forget how this is calculated ;-) where the vtable is emitted with exceptions enabled (which AFAIR enables rtti and

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DBG_TRACE_BASIC

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
On 25/03/11 19:48, Xisco Faulí wrote: Hi, This macro is never defined so I delete it. well I think we'll keep it, I think it is useful, is seems to be failrly new ( commited 2010-07-26 ) developer only debug tracing, it isn't defined so it isn't enabled unintentionally, personally I'd like t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#32413: Add an apply button to style edit dialog in Writer

2011-03-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Miklos, On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 17:16 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > So I just went the route what Michael suggested, to keep the patch sort, > see the attachement. So - of course you should push that :-) > Of course, in a separate future patch it would be interesting to fix > SfxTabDialo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#34908

2011-03-28 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Monday 28 of March 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:21 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > > Still I think there is something strange happening here > > Are we certain that we compiled the key method of the class (I forget > how this is calculated ;-) where the vtable is emitte

Re: [Libreoffice] -Woverloaded-virtual

2011-03-28 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Friday 25 of March 2011, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > Hello, > > On 03/25/2011 02:13 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > On Friday 25 of March 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote: > >> argh!, I meant to say "then things are *not* too bad", not "*too* bad". > >> I mean that's far less that I would have feared, q

Re: [Libreoffice] translate_toolkit build failure on MacOS

2011-03-28 Thread Petr Mladek
Norbert Thiebaud píše v Ne 27. 03. 2011 v 11:24 -0500: > translate_toolkit seems upset that we build for a 10.4 target despite > being on a 10.6 machine... > > > mkdir: ./unxmacxi.pro/misc/build/translate-toolkit-1.8.1/: File exists > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "./setup.py", line

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [WIP] Remove most of dead code in libs-core

2011-03-28 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, formula and sfx2 pushed. The files WriterHelper.java and DocumentMetadataAccess.java changed their place in the code tree but DocumentMetaData.java seems to have been removed. Christina Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí: Here we go with the first round of patches. Whitespaces ar

[Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-28 Thread Lubos Lunak
Hello, I've noticed [*] and the description of what to do makes me wonder what the point of the task actually is. The link in the description seems to suggest that the changes may come from OpenOffice later anyway, but if we want to do the changes ourselves in order to clean up the code, t

Re: [Libreoffice] l10n based on PO files

2011-03-28 Thread Petr Mladek
Andras Timar píše v Pá 25. 03. 2011 v 21:47 +0100: > Hi Petr, > > > Petr Mladek píše v Čt 24. 03. 2011 v 21:38 +0100: > > Worked well, so I have just pushed it. > > Here is the patch of the build repository (master). It is enough not to > call localize-ooo. > > I went through localize-ooo and I

[Libreoffice] operator== always returning sal_False?

2011-03-28 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, during patch reviewing I came across the following: file: sfx2/source/view/frame.cxx int SfxUsrAnyItem::operator==( const SfxPoolItem& /*rItem*/ ) const { return sal_False; } I'm not an c++ expert, but an operator== which is always false can't be of much use?!? Christina __

[Libreoffice] _USE_UNO

2011-03-28 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, there are some places where _USE_UNO is #defined and some lines later it is queried via #ifdef. It seems that _USE_UNO could be removed in that context. Veto or go? Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http:/

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: Remove misuse of SfxItemSet API from libs-core

2011-03-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Theo, On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:25:32 +0200 Theo van Klaveren wrote: > I've started work on removing all calls to > SfxItemSet::Put(SfxPoolItem &, int which) from the code. Attached the > first two patches, which contains mostly easy cases: Almost all > SfxPoolItems already contained the right W

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: Remove misuse of SfxItemSet API from libs-core

2011-03-28 Thread Theo van Klaveren
Hello Bjoern, 2011/3/28 Bjoern Michaelsen > Hi Theo, > > The changes to > ChangeFontSizeImpl in editeng/source/editeng/editview.cxx > however are assuming that aSet.Get( EE_CHAR_FONTHEIGHT_CJK ) returns a > item with a which-id of EE_CHAR_FONTHEIGHT_CJK, which unfortunately we > cannot assu

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Lubos, On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:45:11 +0200 Lubos Lunak wrote: > Specifically, the simple and logical type for numbers happens to be > 'int'. Some kind of intptr type is usually only for ugly hacks, and > bit-precise types are mainly for marshalling. Is there any point in > keeping the task as

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cppcheck variableScope cleanliness

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
On 25/03/11 19:46, Kayo Hamid wrote: This patch removes some variableScope warnings from http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com, sending for review. revol_ looks good to me, pushed ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://l

Re: [Libreoffice] operator== always returning sal_False?

2011-03-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Christina, On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:45:49 +0200 Christina Roßmanith wrote: > Hi, > > during patch reviewing I came across the following: > > file: sfx2/source/view/frame.cxx > > int SfxUsrAnyItem::operator==( const SfxPoolItem& /*rItem*/ ) const > { > return sal_False; > } > > > I'm n

Re: [Libreoffice] _USE_UNO

2011-03-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christina, On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:48 +0200, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > there are some places where _USE_UNO is #defined and some lines later it > is queried via #ifdef. It seems that _USE_UNO could be removed in that > context. :-) > Veto or go? So I would remove it. On

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-03-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||31606 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Biel

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST( SvSlotElementList, SvSlotElement* )

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
Mostly pushed as is, I changed in slot.cxx +for (SvSlotElementList::iterator it = pCurSlot+1; it != rSlotList.end(); ++it) to SvSlotElementList::iterator it = ( pCurSlot != rSlotList.end() ) ? ++pCurSlot : rSlotList.end(); for ( ; it != rSlotList.end(); ++it) 'cau

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 12

2011-03-28 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 12th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:hot LO-3.4 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug fix release There are two logs for each branch: +

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix odfflatxml and xsltfilter component registration

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
adding pushed as I see it is already committed ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC intended student

2011-03-28 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Hugo, I'm adding the libreoffice dev mailing list in CC, please prefer this way to communicate as others can help you too. On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:29 -0300, Hugo Leonardo Melo dos Santos wrote: > I have read some bugs. I am interested to solve the bug 34413, but I do not > know if this is sol

Re: [Libreoffice] Test LibreOffice@

2011-03-28 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > > please excuse me for another annoying "Test", unfortunately I have some > problems with this particular mailing list (all other ones work fine). I can > read, but not post, and sender > > looks suspicious. Not suspicious at alll. When

Re: [Libreoffice] translate_toolkit build failure on MacOS

2011-03-28 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 27/03/11 18:24, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > translate_toolkit seems upset that we build for a 10.4 target despite > being on a 10.6 machine... > FWIW, I get failed build on OSX in translate_toolkit too, but different error message : /Users/alex/DevHack/git/libo/solver/300/unxmacxi.pro/lib/tr

Re: [Libreoffice] Test LibreOffice@

2011-03-28 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 10:39am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: please excuse me for another annoying "Test", unfortunately I have some problems with this particular mailing list (all other ones work fine). I can read, but not post, and send

Re: [Libreoffice] dev300m103: list of python scripts is empty (?)

2011-03-28 Thread Clio
28.03.2011 04:54, Caolán McNamara пишет: Sorry, what's your bug ? Are you reporting that in LibreOffice master, post merge of the dev300m103 stuff into it, that the python scripting under windows is now nonfunctional again ? Yes. But I forgot that fdo#33555 affects oly Windows. I get the same b

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove obsolete macro

2011-03-28 Thread Xisco Faulí
Last time It was used was back in 2000. From a4b55d6390006b032a34cc6a252726d3e35e2dcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xisco Fauli Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:03:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove unotest macro --- basic/source/app/mybasic.cxx | 22 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertio

Re: [Libreoffice] Test LibreOffice@

2011-03-28 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Kevin, *; On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: > At 10:39am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> It will then send a probe/warning message, and if that is rejected as >> well, send a last probe, and if

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
On 26/03/11 13:42, Peter Jentsch wrote: Hi, I now have a first working implementation of the XSLT extension functions which currently prevent the Office 2003 ML filters from using the libxslt based transformation service. The patch affects 3 modules: solenv: new PACKAGE2LIB variable defined in

Re: [Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project - pointers ...

2011-03-28 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello Maxime and Michael IMO I would like to use 2.2 from the reason you've said and because I personally have 2.2 phone ;-) Anyway, since I'm just a newbie here, I prefer more opinion on this. Best Regards -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak 2011/3/26 Maxime Côté > First of all thanks for your answer >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove obsolete macro

2011-03-28 Thread Noel Power
On 28/03/11 16:07, Xisco Faulí wrote: Last time It was used was back in 2000. right, seems completely useless, pushed ( presumably this contribution GPL3+/GPL3+/MPL ) and thanks for the patch!!! Noel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.fre

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-03-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||35744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

Re: [Libreoffice] Test LibreOffice@

2011-03-28 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:36am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 10:39am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote: it smells like a misconfiguration of the list or FDO's mailing setup somewhere. Is there something obvious I'm overlooki

[Libreoffice] Bugzilla and EasyHack marks.

2011-03-28 Thread Kayo Hamid
Hey, we have one inconsistency with EasyHack marks at Bugzilla. Some are EasyHack and others [EasyHack], the result is: 13 bugs - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=LibreOffice&content=EasyHacks (link from wiki/Develo

[Libreoffice] Problem with build environment: Gtk-linkage error

2011-03-28 Thread Albert Thuswaldner
Hi, Sorry to bother you, but I have a problem with my build environment that I can not figure out by myself. I suspect that there is something obvious... I'm on a vanilla Opensuse 11.4. I have the required dependencies installed gtk, gtk-devel and so on. I have also the libreoffice-bootstrap packa

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem with build environment: Gtk-linkage error

2011-03-28 Thread Kayo Hamid
Hey I'm on a vanilla Opensuse 11.4. I have the required dependencies me too, with KDE4 installed gtk, gtk-devel and so on. I have also the libreoffice-bootstrap package installed but I don't use it directly (should I?) sorry but that is not clear to me, you did zypper si -d OpenOffice_org

[Libreoffice] Development-/Future-Builds of LibreOffice with special naming posible?

2011-03-28 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, the development of LibreOffice and its features are growing every day and week ;-) In my opinion it would be a good idea to have a special build (nightly build or something similar) with a special naming, maybe LibO-Future, so that it is posible to install that build in parallel on you

Re: [Libreoffice] EasyHack: Improved bug filing form / flow

2011-03-28 Thread Samuel Atkins
Hi guys, Sorry if I went a bit quiet about this! I'm still working on it. Current version as always is at: http://atkinslg.dyndns.org:4080/stuff/submitbug.html Currently, the help text stuff appears in a box on the right when the user clicks on a link. I'm not currently loading it from the wi

Re: [Libreoffice] XCU and XCS files in recent releases

2011-03-28 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hi Caolán Thanks for the tip. I did a simple sitewide snippet, which is apparently read at startup ( deducted by reductio ab absurdo: if the xml of the snippet is broken, LO does not start), but it does not work as I want (and I took it from main.xcd). The result should be the elimination of

Re: [Libreoffice] [EasyHack][Print current page] How to get the last active page number?

2011-03-28 Thread Peter Jentsch
Hi Skyler, if you want to access the page number at the currently selected position in the document, you'll have to first get the current selection (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/OfficeDev/Component/Controllers#XSelectionSupplier), figure if there's actually a *po

Re: [Libreoffice] XCU and XCS files in recent releases

2011-03-28 Thread Clio
It seems XCU were renamed to XCD (D - default). XCD - default registry values. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem with build environment: Gtk-linkage error

2011-03-28 Thread Albert Thuswaldner
Hi, Thanks for the quick reply. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 20:34, Kayo Hamid wrote: > Hey > >> I'm on a vanilla Opensuse 11.4. I have the required dependencies > > me too, with KDE4 > >> installed gtk, gtk-devel and so on. I have also the >> libreoffice-bootstrap package installed but I don't use it

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem with build environment: Gtk-linkage error

2011-03-28 Thread Kayo Hamid
Hey, No I just installed the rpm libreoffice-bootstrap package with the following description: "libreoffice-bootstrap - LibreOffice Build Bootstrap This packages provides the basic tools and framework for building LibreOffice using separate source packages." I did not install the source packa

Re: [Libreoffice] Bugzilla and EasyHack marks.

2011-03-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Kayo, On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:53:10 -0300 Kayo Hamid wrote: > Hey, we have one inconsistency with EasyHack marks at Bugzilla. Some > are EasyHack and others [EasyHack], the result is: > > 13 bugs - > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&

Re: [Libreoffice] EasyHack: Improved bug filing form / flow

2011-03-28 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Sam! That already looks *amazing* ... especially the thoughtful textual descriptions - thanks for your hard work. Nevertheless, I played a bit with the site and came up with some stuff - mostly minor things or questions. And - as always - skip those items that might have been mis-interpreted o

[Libreoffice] mdds 0.5.2

2011-03-28 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Just FYI, I'm working on upgrading the mdds package from the current 0.5.1 to the latest 0.5.2. Please expect a change in this area shortly. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.

Re: [Libreoffice] mdds 0.5.2

2011-03-28 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:02 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Just FYI, I'm working on upgrading the mdds package from the current > 0.5.1 to the latest 0.5.2. Please expect a change in this area shortly. Done. Now the next build should automatically download the new package. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshi

[Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report jobs stalled

2011-03-28 Thread someone
Hi *. Sorry to say that it appears a hardware problem (bad RAM) has put a stop to cppcheck's 5 hour report runs that get pushed to http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . I'm RMA-ing the RAM today, and hopefully we'll see the replacements in a few weeks, if not sooner. Sorry for not writing sooner