Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:50:17 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Tuesday 30 of November 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Additionally, I think most classes don't necessarily need detailed > > docs for all methods in the first place (which may also hurt later > > merging from OOo), but would already be

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> After having years of experience using a nice, intuitive > and well-documented APIs (Qt,KDE), But surely you should realize the causality here? It is exactly your years of experience with them that makes Qt and KDE seem nice and intuitive. It is extremely hard, probably impossible, to come u

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > What does bFull mean? Not so quick? What portions will be formatted if > this is FALSE? Looking at the function it either calls > pImpEditEngine->FormatFullDoc(); > or > pImpEditEngine->FormatDoc(); > > What the heck is the difference between those functions? Now I h

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 --- Comment #20 from Tor Lillqvist 2010-12-01 01:27:31 PST --- I don't think bug #32007 is a blocker, it appears in quite rarely used functionality, as far as I can guess. And if the user doesn't know what an "EvolutionLocal" is, why would he/sh

[Libreoffice] PATCH: Try to find the proper berkeley db headers and incs

2010-12-01 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi, So this is a modified versio nof patches/dev300/system-db-check.diff to find the proper berkeley db headers and libs. I really would like to get this into bootstrap so please test and comment. Thanks >From 8f5b9b8c85ae9d95dbe13b38abc3b473c045a138 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Nagy Da

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > After having years of experience using a nice, intuitive > > and well-documented APIs (Qt,KDE), > > But surely you should realize the causality here? It is exactly your years > of experience with them that makes Qt and KDE seem nice and int

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Yifan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|32010 | --- Comment #21 from Yifan 2010-12-01 03:22:57

[Libreoffice] ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making sysui/util and helpcontent2/source/auxiliary

2010-12-01 Thread imacat
elow. Is there a way to solve this? Thank you very much in advance. === % ./autogen.sh --with-git --with-num-cpus=2 --with-lang="en-US zh-TW" ... % ./download ... % make ... Entering /usr/local/src/libreoffice-3.2.99.2-zh_TW-20101201/build/libreoffice-3.2

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > - I have to single-click on the INSRT and STD->EXT->ADD->BLK and > language selection thingies, but to double-click on the Page 1/1 and > "Default" for something to happen. I just found out by coincidence > today that I can l

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Tuesday 30 of November 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi Lubos, > > adding documentation for what you describe doesn't help much, if at > all. Core API is reasonably documented, see offapi/udkapi/sal/basegfx. What is core API then? Do things under e.g. libs-core count as well? If yes, then j

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > see? That's what I meant, documentation for most of the higher-level > methods is either > > a) superficial > b) so much prose that you're better off debugging the code in the >first place > > (bFull has *a lot* of side effects, and no

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Mattias Johnsson
>> Personally I think it would be very nice if source files had just a few >> lines of comment telling what they are about, from a very high perspective. >> Every time I am searching for the implementation of some functionality in >> the OOo/LO codebase, I find myself looking at source files with v

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 1/5] more shadowing fixed sw3io

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:18 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > Hello, > here some patches trying to make the compiler less verbose within > binfilter. Looks good, pushed. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedeskto

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 2/5] trivial warning fixes in binfilter

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:21 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards All good, pushed. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 3/5] trivial warning fixes within binfilter bf_sw doc

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:21 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Looks fine, pushed. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 4/5] trivial warning cleaning in binfilter - unocore (1)

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:43 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Pushed, looks good, thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 5/5] trivial warning cleaning in binfilter - unocore (2)

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:23 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > regards Yup, all good, pushed as well. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:26 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > in the next few minutes What's the situation with the l10n module ? i.e. If someeone does a ./autogen --with-lang="something that isn't en_US" something somewhere should clone l10n as well. C. _

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Mattias, Mattias Johnsson píše v Ne 28. 11. 2010 v 14:40 +1100: > Also one of the easy hacks. > > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at > original position, rather than moved to the position of the last > replacement. Wow! - what a great usability improvement, wi

[Libreoffice] [UX] Some dirty stuffs around styles in calc

2010-12-01 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi all, The other day when playing with a calc document, I discovered an annoying "feature". Create a new spreadsheet, protect one of the sheets and try to modify the cell styles: nothing shows up when clicking on the "Modify..." context menu. I had to run a debug session in sc to understand that

Re: [Libreoffice] ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making sysui/util and helpcontent2/source/auxiliary

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 19:30 +0800, imacat wrote: > Dear all, > > Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I'm running Debian Lenny 5.0.6, > gcc 4.3.2, glibc 2.7. I tried to build LibreOffice 3.2.99.2 with > Traditional Chinese language, as suggested: > > % ./autogen.sh --with-git --with-num-cpus=2

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Mattias Johnsson
On 2 December 2010 00:30, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Mattias, > > Mattias Johnsson píše v Ne 28. 11. 2010 v 14:40 +1100: > >> Also one of the easy hacks. >> >> Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at >> original position, rather than moved to the position of the last >>

Re: [Libreoffice] [Release note 3.4] Re: Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:30:41 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at > > original position, rather than moved to the position of the last > > replacement. > > Wow! - what a great usability improvement, with few lines of code :-) > Pushed

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-01 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Aquilina píše v Út 30. 11. 2010 v 09:28 +0100: > Hey guys I am experiencing a really nasty HC issue. > > I am using the obsidian theme on KDE. attached find an image that > shows > what happens. You are unable to see the text, unless you high light > it. > Hopefully this

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Mattias, > > Mattias Johnsson píše v Ne 28. 11. 2010 v 14:40 +1100: > > Also one of the easy hacks. > > > > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at > > original position, rather than moved to the position of the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Mattias Johnsson
On 2 December 2010 01:05, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> Hi Mattias, >> >> Mattias Johnsson píše v Ne 28. 11. 2010 v 14:40 +1100: >> > Also one of the easy hacks. >> > >> > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at >> > orig

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Lubos, Lubos Lunak píše v St 01. 12. 2010 v 15:05 +0100: > > > Also one of the easy hacks. > > > > > > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at > > > original position, rather than moved to the position of the last > > > replacement. > > > > Wow! - what a great usabil

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > There appears to be a helper class for this, SwCrsrSaveState. Except > > that it > > doesn't seem to work, as far as I can judge SwCursor::RestoreState() > > doesn't > > really restore anything (quite hard to say, so much for "trivial API

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:31:56 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > I've figured it out. SwCrsrSaveState only saves the state on the stack, the > actual restoring is done by SwCursor::RestoreSavePos(). I'll change the code > to use it. While you are understanding the code, can you add some comments to the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:31:56 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > I've figured it out. SwCrsrSaveState only saves the state on the stack, > > the actual restoring is done by SwCursor::RestoreSavePos(). I'll change > > the code to use it. > > Whi

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] minor updates to bootstrap/g

2010-12-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, Updated expressions in bootstrap/g so that it uses Bash internal expressions, rather than farming out to the '[' or 'test' external command. Updated deprecated backtick subshell calls to $( Cheers, Kevin minor_g_updates.tar.xz Description: application/xz ___

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-01 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
If you guys have any further questions regarding this issue please don't hesitate to contact me. On 12/01/2010 03:01 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Aquilina píše v Út 30. 11. 2010 v 09:28 +0100: Hey guys I am experiencing a really nasty HC issue. I am using the obsidian the

[Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-01 Thread Wols Lists
Have we lost a patch somewhere? Just trashed my old development directory by mistake :-) so I'm trying to follow the new download and build instructions. ./autogen.sh bombs as follows ... checking whether to enable EPM for packing... yes checking for epm... no EPM will be built. checking which pac

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 01:22 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > I am sure it is not hard to find people who think the OOo code APIs > are elegant, consistent and intuitive. And they would be equally > right. Well, I've been working on OOo (and now LibO) code base roughly about 6 years now, and I haven't

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:37 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > see? That's what I meant, documentation for most of the higher-level > > methods is either > > > > a) superficial > > b) so much prose that you're better off debugging the code in t

Re: [Libreoffice] ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making sysui/util and helpcontent2/source/auxiliary

2010-12-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 03:06 +0800, imacat wrote: > I would love to, but those lines are all I got. Is there any way to > ... build the sysui module independently? I > tried "make sysui" or "make sysui/util" or "make -f > build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/sysui/util/makefile.mk", with no success You

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:25 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > But I've already become immune to this hard-to-figure-out code base, so > I stopped thinking that way years ago. I've even trained myself to > ignore those German comments. When I see functions, I see chunks of > code, not functions. ;-)

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jan, On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:01 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > As discussed on the IRC, it is because the we don't have HC graphics for > the StartPage... Wait, wait ... :-) > Christoph - please, would you be able to provide a version of the > StartPage graphics that is black, with t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Matthias, On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 14:40 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at > original position, rather than moved to the position of the last > replacement. Wow - cool; that was one of the MS compete bugs AFAIR that they us

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:03 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Is there a use case to justify exposing any of this to users? > > Can you expand on what you mean by 'any of this'? I guess the root problem is that you can do operations in a spreadsheet that (when saved) produce a different do

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH: Try to find the proper berkeley db headers and incs

2010-12-01 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Robert, Robert Nagy píše v St 01. 12. 2010 v 11:27 +0100: > Hi, > > So this is a modified versio nof patches/dev300/system-db-check.diff > to find the proper berkeley db headers and libs. > I really would like to get this into bootstrap so please test and comment. It looks reasonable and work

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Christoph, On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 22:31 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > DOCUMENT CHANGED INDICATION > > I read all the comments very carefully and I understand some thoughts > and concerns. However, the constraints / requirements do support Kohei's > solution (if we want to keep the current sa

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:28 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:03 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > > Is there a use case to justify exposing any of this to users? > > > > Can you expand on what you mean by 'any of this'? > > I guess the root problem is that you can do ope

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 08:16 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Part 2 on the Changed icon part. > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:44 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > > DOCUMENT CHANGED INDICATION> > > A solution should: > > * just work > > * be unobtrusive (don't catch attention if it isn't

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-01 Thread Wols Lists
On 01/12/10 19:13, Wols Lists wrote: > Have we lost a patch somewhere? Just trashed my old development > directory by mistake :-) so I'm trying to follow the new download and > build instructions. ./autogen.sh bombs as follows ... > > checking whether to enable EPM for packing... yes > checking for

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:00 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Now, as I said in my other post, I would very much like to have > someone with good artistic sense to help me come up with new images to > replace the current ones. I'll try to find the current images and > post them to the list shortly.

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:26 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > in the next few minutes So - a quick reminder, the new wiki page is at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build And migration is not quite as simple as all that; however - if you h

[Libreoffice] [rft 78] : marketing list for businesses in the UK

2010-12-01 Thread Carolina dick
In response to your email I am sending you this list of all our databases for sale. This week only there are package deals available for more than one list. HEALTHCARE > Doctors (34 different specialties) > Chiropractors > Alternative Medicine > Dentists > Dentists with Specialties > Veterinar

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Lubos Lunak wrote: > See? So nobody actually knows what the code really does, and everytime > somebody changes something there, they possibly have a slightly different > understanding of the purpose, resulting in even bigger mess. That's yet > another advantage of documentation - even you yours

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Caolan McNamara wrote: > What's the situation with the l10n module ? i.e. If someeone does a > ./autogen --with-lang="something that isn't en_US" > something somewhere should clone l10n as well. > Fix for that on my disk, preempted by other things, and was pointed to bin/repo-list, which I need t

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:13:36PM +, Wols Lists wrote: > Have we lost a patch somewhere? Just trashed my old development > directory by mistake :-) so I'm trying to follow the new download and > build instructions. ./autogen.sh bombs as follows ... > > checking whether to enable EPM for packi

[Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, I've runned autogen.sh present in rawbuild and i've got : Bad substitution. After having added a set -x at the beginning of the script, I found it was in the function requote, all these lines are ko : set -- "${@//\'/$q\'$q}"# quote inner instances of ' set -- "${

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-01 Thread Wols Lists
On 01/12/10 21:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:13:36PM +, Wols Lists wrote: >> Have we lost a patch somewhere? Just trashed my old development >> directory by mistake :-) so I'm trying to follow the new download and >> build instructions. ./autogen.sh bombs as follows ...

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-01 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Michael, On 2010-12-01 at 21:23 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > cp config.log ../bootstrap [...] > ./autogen.sh # should re-use args from your old config.log Unfortunately not, due to trouble on MacOSX, the cached params are now stored in autogen.lastrun; so the best is to copy the

[Libreoffice] Why BLK selection mode? (was: Re: LO status bar annoyances)

2010-12-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi David, Sebastian, all! Am Mittwoch, den 01.12.2010, 12:51 +0100 schrieb David Tardon: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > - I have to single-click on the INSRT and STD->EXT->ADD->BLK and > > language selection thingies, but to double-click on the Page 1/1 a

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-01 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:45:18PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:13:36PM +, Wols Lists wrote: > > Have we lost a patch somewhere? Just trashed my old development > > directory by mistake :-) so I'm trying to follow the new download and > > build instructions. ./aut

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Julien, On 2010-12-01 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > I've runned autogen.sh present in rawbuild and i've got : Bad substitution. > After having added a set -x at the beginning of the script, I found it > was in the function requote, all these lines are ko : > > set -- "${@//\'

[Libreoffice] [Visual Design] Request for Icon Artwork (was: Re: [UX] LO status bar annoyances)

2010-12-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi all! I forward this request to the LibreOffice Design Team, okay? Guys, Kohei asks for two icons to improve the current behavior of the status bar. More detailed, it is about the little "Document Modified" icon that appears if ... hard to guess ... a document has been modified and is not yet s

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-01 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:26 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> in the next few minutes > >        So - a quick reminder, the new wiki page is at: > >        http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build > >        An

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] minor updates to bootstrap/g

2010-12-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 10:37am -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: Updated expressions in bootstrap/g so that it uses Bash internal expressions, rather than farming out to the '[' or 'test' external command. Updated deprecated backtick subshell calls to $( I've just learned of/realized the not-Bash-specif

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi all! Am Mittwoch, den 01.12.2010, 08:12 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Spaeth: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:44 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: [...] > > STATUS BAR > > For example, the little '*' is mainly caused by the need for a very compact > > symbol - here, please think in 480px width. > > Is there

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Kendy, hi Jonathan! Am Mittwoch, den 01.12.2010, 15:01 +0100 schrieb Jan Holesovsky: > Hi Jonathan, > > Jonathan Aquilina píše v Út 30. 11. 2010 v 09:28 +0100: > > > Hey guys I am experiencing a really nasty HC issue. Oh dear ... :-) > > I am using the obsidian theme on KDE. attached find a

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] Some dirty stuffs around styles in calc

2010-12-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Cedric, since I go through my mails from top to bottom, I'm sorry to say that I now miss the time to give that some thought. But, the good message is, tomorrow will be our department Christmas party ... plenty of time to think about such issues :-) I'll be back ... if not, please ping me, oka

Re: [Libreoffice] ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making sysui/util and helpcontent2/source/auxiliary

2010-12-01 Thread imacat
Oh. I see. ^^; Sorry. This is indeed suggested in the end of the log but I missed it. == % cd build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2 % . ./LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh % cd sysui % build build -- version: 275224 ... Entering /usr/local/src/libreoffice-3.2.99.2-zh_TW-20101201/b

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Suren
Hey Kendy, The new portability stuff added to autogen.sh works fine for me now( in /bin/sh itself that is). Regards, ~Suren On 12/02/2010 04:49 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Julien, On 2010-12-01 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: I've runned autogen.sh present in rawbuild and i've got :

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Ismael
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: BLK selects (roughly) rectangular blocks (is this useful for anything?) D. Block selection is useful when copying text from PDF files that were in columns. ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Mattias Johnsson
On 2 December 2010 07:23, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 14:40 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: >> Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at >> original position, rather than moved to the position of the last >> replacement. > >        Wow - co

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

2010-12-01 Thread Mattias Johnsson
On 2 December 2010 01:31, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> >  There appears to be a helper class for this, SwCrsrSaveState. Except >> > that it >> > doesn't seem to work, as far as I can judge SwCursor::RestoreState() >> > doesn't >> > really restore

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Julien Nabet
Le 02/12/2010 00:19, Jan Holesovsky a écrit : Hi Julien, On 2010-12-01 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: I've runned autogen.sh present in rawbuild and i've got : Bad substitution. After having added a set -x at the beginning of the script, I found it was in the function requote, all the

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
what is the difference between using /bin/sh and /bin/bash? On 12/2/10 4:35 AM, Suren wrote: Hey Kendy, The new portability stuff added to autogen.sh works fine for me now( in /bin/sh itself that is). Regards, ~Suren On 12/02/2010 04:49 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Julien, On 2010-12-01 a

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Beware - I am a newcomer - maybe my point of view is quite wrong due to lack of understanding. But then at least I will understand something better :- ) My first remark: stepping in seems to me to be very difficult despite the very friendly behaviour of people here. > un-documented code-base is a

[Libreoffice] Building problem, cppunit, libcppunit undefined reference to dlopen

2010-12-01 Thread Joost Eekhoorn
I missed the e-mail about moving from rawbuild to native build, so I did remove the old installation. Then I did a new Native Build installation as described on the wiki page. I failed with this dl problem in cppunit: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/joost/work/git/libo/clone/libs-extern/cppuni

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Tor Lillqvist
>>> On 2010-12-02 at 08:44, wrote: > what is the difference between using /bin/sh and /bin/bash? It's morning, so I feel like rambling: /bin/bash, if it exists, presumably can always be assumed to be Bash, the GNU "Bourne-Again" Shell. Hopefully some relatively recent version of it. On some U

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-12-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
surensp...@gmail.com wrote: > After few sleepless nights spent grokking and with quite a big deal > help from IRC and the list, have come up with the first cuts working > version of the External Edit functionality[1]. Have attached the > patches rebased against the latest master. > Hi Suren, I had

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-01 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Why not drop merging from OOO after LibO 3.3? Because there is still a significant number of people working on OOo, and they are in many cases the best experts there are on the code they are working on, and they are doing significant and useful improvements? Because there is no licensing rea