On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> When you apply a series in sequence, at any point the result must be
> buildable...
> 1/ it is good practice
> 2/ if that is not the case bisection is much harder
... but it has a lower importance than having the tip of master bui
On 06/14/2012 04:57 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 06/13/2012 03:00 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I think you are confusing buildability after each patch of a series has been
applied in sequence (which is a desirable property indeed) vs.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 03:00 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>
>
> I think you are confusing buildability after each patch of a series has been
> applied in sequence (which is a desirable property indeed) vs. buildable
> with each patch of a series app
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:36:12PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Where are we going to get these tinderboxes? The page for master lists 17
> tinderboxes, out of which only about 11 build regularly. Out of which there
> are 4 linux-gcc tinderboxes, one linux-clang, 1(2?) macosx, 3 windows and
On Tuesday 12 of June 2012, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a proposal to get as much focused tinderboxing as possible with
> limited resources and unreliable build clients. This also assumes patches
> under consideration to be independant (that is: without conflicts) and not
> depen
On 06/13/2012 03:00 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
Well, I simplified a bit here. When using gerrit you would push one patch
separate if it is independant and multiple patches as a series if they are
dependant. gerrit handles that correct
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> But we are doing that not now as pushes are atomic (or more precise:
> ref-updates are), so tinderboxes wouldnt see a half-push.
true. but just because we don't, doesn't mean we shouldn't
> Also all patches in a
> series have the same o
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:00:12AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Well... it _should_ be buildable at each step of the patch series...
> if not, clean-it up, it is not yet 'published' in the git sens of the
> term so you still have a chance to git rebase -i to fix things up.
>
> Building at each
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
>
> Well, I simplified a bit here. When using gerrit you would push one patch
> separate if it is independant and multiple patches as a series if they are
> dependant. gerrit handles that correctly as a 'patch series'. I would not want
> to
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Maybe I misunderstood, but the independency and arbitrary order I see as
> a problem. People do work in iterative steps.. so if we could at least
> assure that patches by the same author are ordered correctly that might
> work.
We
Hi Bjoern,
On Tuesday, 2012-06-12 16:45:06 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> This also assumes patches under consideration to be independant (that
> is: without conflicts) and not dependant on a specific order.
Maybe I misunderstood, but the independency and arbitrary order I see as
a problem. P
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:45:06PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> After sending off the tinderbox with just this one patch, do:
>
> p-innocent(patch)/=p-innocent(testcase)
>
> for all patches in each tinderbox run with this patch (once for each run)
... and this should probably then be:
>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:45:06PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> After sending off the tinderbox with this patchset, do:
>p-innocent(patch) *= p-innocent(testcase)
> reducing the innocence of the patches without waiting for results. So we
> assume
> the patches of the set to be partially g
Hi all,
this is a proposal to get as much focused tinderboxing as possible with limited
resources and unreliable build clients. This also assumes patches under
consideration to be independant (that is: without conflicts) and not dependant
on a specific order. gerrit allow us to have patches indepe
14 matches
Mail list logo
