On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > But we are doing that not now as pushes are atomic (or more precise: > ref-updates are), so tinderboxes wouldnt see a half-push.
true. but just because we don't, doesn't mean we shouldn't > Also all patches in a > series have the same owner, so blaming is easy. blaming is one thing, quality is another. > The first goal of the > tinderboxes is to have the master tip buildable all times -- having it > buildable at every random commit is secondary. secondary but important nonetheless. > Also: bibisect etc. could be > taught to only look for commits where the next commit date is at least 5 > minutes > off. No, that would not help. two commit cane within 5 minutes and yet independant and 2 commit can be 5 minutes apart and yet belong to the same patch-serie iow, the timestamp of a commit is not very helpful in general wrt to tinderbox Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
