On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 09:29 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> But sure, the abstraction as-is is practically a disaster.
Great - added the health warning to master =)
> Given that threading primitives are standardized since C++11, I think it
> makes more sense in the long run to deprecat
On 11/28/2013 07:00 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
+/**
+ * Warning: the Condition abstraction is inadequate for any
+ * situation where there may be multiple threads waiting on
+ * the same condition. It can only be used to synchronise
+ * interactions between two threads cf. lost
Hi there,
I was writing a thread-pool class the other day - against the clock cf.
master's sc/source/filter/oox/threadpool.* - and it was interesting to
become a victim of the apparently well known lost wakeup issue that our
approach to osl::Conditions creates.
I propose the follo
