On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 09:29 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> But sure, the abstraction as-is is practically a disaster.
Great - added the health warning to master =)
> Given that threading primitives are standardized since C++11, I think it
> makes more sense in the long run to deprecate and ultimately remove our
> platform abstraction layer's corresponding features than to add to them.
Sounds fair enough.
> If the Boost Thread library should already be usable in your case, I
> would strongly suggest to go with it.
IIRC there was some horrible problem with using that - but I forget
what it was; IIRC we don't (yet) use it in LibreOffice - anyone has any
recollection of what that was ?
> > PS. Stephan - any chance you can reply-to-All ? ;-)
> Michael, any chance of not using reply-to-all?
Sure - OTOH; the list is configured as it is, deliberately, to let
people get replies to their mails without subscribing - to increase
community accessibility & openness. I take advantage of that to
prioritize my mail reading & appreciate a personal reply =)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
