On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:02:43PM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> It's a bit dubious to have a page that's not widely published, since
> the stats are heavily skewed then; and at the same time the reasons
> _not_ to publicize it widely are good ones & similar to the fact we
> don't have the featu
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > Is that a page we actively use (if so, I need to give it more attention) ?
>
> No.
>
I'd even say 'emphatically not'. :)
It's a bit dubious to have a page that's not widely published, since
the stats are heavily skewed then; and at the same time the reasons
_not_ to pu
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:28 AM, jan iversen
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> During me work with the development pages in our Wiki, I came across this page
>
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Vote_for_Enhancement
>
> Is that a page we actively use (if so, I need to give it more attention) ?
No.
__
Hi.
During me work with the development pages in our Wiki, I came across this page
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Vote_for_Enhancement
Is that a page we actively use (if so, I need to give it more attention) ?
I would prefer, not to run votes as such, but have a ideas page (exist already)
