Matteo Casalin-3 wrote
> ...
> I don't have any comment about your proposal, but just would like to
> add that unless we know for sure that nHeight!=0 at that point, in
> both codes the check should be
>
> if( nHeight <= 0 )
>
> in order to solve the division by 0 completely.
You're right of cou
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:01:49AM +0200, Matteo Casalin wrote:
>> I wonder if we should not rather do something like:
>> double dRatioPreV;
>> if( nHeight < 0 )
>> {
>> nHeight = 0;
>> dRatioPreV = 1; // or rather zero? or +infinity? Do we want to
>> // "force" a branch of
Hi,
On Fri, 30 May 2014 07:17:57 +0200
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
[...]
>
> I wonder if we should not rather do something like:
>
> double dRatioPreV;
> if( nHeight < 0 )
> {
> nHeight = 0;
> dRatioPreV = 1; // or rather zero? or +infinity? Do we want to
> // "force" a br
