Le Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:10:33 +0200, Andras Timar a
écrit:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Mat M wrote:
* startmenuicon.cxx: was used to have a special icon on start menu
folder.
Disabled since vista.
=> to be removed
Please keep it, we still support Windows XP.
Well, it is no
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Mat M wrote:
>>> * startmenuicon.cxx: was used to have a special icon on start menu
>>> folder.
>>> Disabled since vista.
>>> => to be removed
>>
>>
>> Please keep it, we still support Windows XP.
>
>
> Well, it is not about supporting XP, it is about setti
Le Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:36:48 +0200, Andras Timar a
écrit:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Mat M wrote:
CAs (Custom Action) outside shellextensions are fine.
Well, the job of regactivex/regpatchactivex should be done by normal
actions, custom action is for this is a hack.
OK, but I only
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Mat M wrote:
> CAs (Custom Action) outside shellextensions are fine.
Well, the job of regactivex/regpatchactivex should be done by normal
actions, custom action is for this is a hack.
> About shellextensions ones, here is my status:
>
> * checkdirectory.cxx : wa
On 06/17/2013 12:35 AM, Mat M wrote:
* layerlinks.cxx: handle creation of a ure-link file at root. this file
is used to abstract URE path in code (mainly installation related,
though). My question is: could we create this file during instsetoo and
add it as a simple file in the MSI, so CustomActi
Le Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:29:37 +0200, Andras Timar a
écrit:
Hi Mat,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Mat M wrote:
Hello,
I'm tackling back to fdo#39632 [1]. But I have a question about current
implementation.
I started my work with checkdirectory.cxx[2] , which is called 2 times
during a typi
Hi Mat,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Mat M wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm tackling back to fdo#39632 [1]. But I have a question about current
> implementation.
> I started my work with checkdirectory.cxx[2] , which is called 2 times
> during a typical install.
>
> I just added the two last message b
