Yes, indeed, i have taken a huge blindness !!
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the
> cpu power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a four-core,
hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's point of view)?
What is 100 di
In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
power.
I think that this problem must be analyzed.
Best,
walter
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a
> cpu core to the limit.
M
Hi *
About windows / Cygwin performance.
I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
core to the limit.
The best that the cl.exe can is 13% cpu usage without any I/O activity.
Where is the time spent ?
Any Idea ?
I have a i7 870 @ 2.93 GHz, HT enabled.
Best,
Walter
Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any way
by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Best regards
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab.
But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
MS compiler?
Best Regards
walter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Walter,
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:50 +0100, walter wrote:
> A few weeks ago I spoke by telephone with Italo Vignoli (The Document
> Foundation) explaining my needs and the work that I hope to do.
Sure, but unless you clearly explain your needs, it's hard for everyone
else to know what y
A few weeks ago I spoke by telephone with Italo Vignoli (The Document
Foundation) explaining my needs and the work that I hope to do.
Regards
walter
___
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, walter
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, walter wrote:
> My only problem is knowing whether to invest my time in 'cygwin' or Linux.
> I need to build a customized version, and the new code will be returned to
> the community
It depends what you want to achieve. If you want to get a bug fixed
th
>In other words, you are doing this commercially, as part of your job, for
business purposes?
[walter] YES
>So you are instead demanding that the "community" (which consists of
volunteers spending their own personal resources, and paid developers
working for >companies that might even be your co
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:02 +0100, walter wrote:
> It would be interesting that a core developer uses Cygwin :)
I do when I'm on Windows. It's not like we have any other choices
anyway.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffic
It would be interesting that a core developer uses Cygwin :)
> But the real problem is that if the community does not want or can not
> support then development on the windows platform is good for me to say
> this very clearly.
> I can not go and play around and waste time in this way.
What d
I am a windows developer and I need to integrate LibreOffice in our windows
business application.
I would have a hard time switching to develop using Linux.
But the real problem is that if the community does not want or can not
support then development on the windows platform is good for me to say
In the long run the best choice is definitely to abandon cygwin and develop
using Linux.
I used cygwin for a little while and I've seen that is not well supported L
Which version of Linux is better to use?
There are big differences between using Ubuntu and CentOS?
Regards,
walter
13 matches
Mail list logo