Re: Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Chris Sherlock
On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > > 2013/4/21 Chris Sherlock 'cvml', 'chris.sherloc...@gmail.com');>> > >> On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >>> >>> >>> No and as long as you don't plan to work on them I doubt anyone is going >>> to do it soon. >> >> >> There's a

Re: Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Markus Mohrhard
2013/4/21 Chris Sherlock > On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >> >> >> No and as long as you don't plan to work on them I doubt anyone is going >> to do it soon. > > > There's a friendly response... Where did you get that idea? > Please understand that posting at the developer mail

Re: Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Noel Grandin
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Chris Sherlock wrote: >> I think it is off-topic here and should be moved to the discuss list. > > > Why is that? It's a fairly innocent enquiry. > This is a list for people actually working on modifying the code of LO. Discussions about what modifications are de

Fwd: Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Chris Sherlock
On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > > No and as long as you don't plan to work on them I doubt anyone is going > to do it soon. There's a friendly response... Where did you get that idea? > Additionally as long as this mainly serves as theoretical discussion Why do you consid

Re: Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Chris, Chris Sherlock schrieb: Hi all, This is a question more from curiosity than anything. Today I was reading that the Journal of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis was not at all happy with Microsoft Excel 2003, stating that: "Given Microsoft’s track record, we recommend that n

Re: Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Markus Mohrhard
> This is a question more from curiosity than anything. > > Today I was reading that the Journal of Computational Statistics and Data > Analysis was not at all happy with Microsoft Excel 2003, stating that: > > "Given Microsoft’s track record, we recommend that no statistical > procedure be used un

Calc statistical accuracy

2013-04-21 Thread Chris Sherlock
Hi all, This is a question more from curiosity than anything. Today I was reading that the Journal of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis was not at all happy with Microsoft Excel 2003, stating that: "Given Microsoft’s track record, we recommend that no statistical procedure be used unles