On 10/19/2015 06:34 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
What else can I do, add to every commit message a line that say: "This
list all the source shas since the last bibisect commit.. for this
bibisect commit this list contain source commit" :-)
Oh, this has never been about what you should do. It i
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 06:05 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>
>> The FULL RANGE here is that single source commit:
>> c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01
>> commit from the bibisect commit 193ccffc25300d5c26e6f30ab06a2315b6bff879
>>
>> and I kn
On 10/19/2015 06:05 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
The FULL RANGE here is that single source commit:
c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01
commit from the bibisect commit 193ccffc25300d5c26e6f30ab06a2315b6bff879
and I know it is a single because it is the only one listed.. if there
was more than
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 05:41 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit
>>> message
>>> mentions a range of more than
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:41:19AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> No it is not irrelevant. with the bad bibisect commit, say
> c49af8fc6406f9e7e8e0b1dcebee6df87bdeb9aa
> you immediately have the answer you seek:
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=bibisect-macosx-64-5.0.git;a=commit;h=
On 10/19/2015 05:41 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit message
mentions a range of more than one source commits.
No it is not irrelevant. with the bad bibisect commit, say
c4
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
>
> But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit message
> mentions a range of more than one source commits.
>
No it is not irrelevant. with the bad bibisect commit, say
c49af8fc6406f9e7e8e0b1dcebee6df87bdeb9aa
you
On 10/19/2015 05:10 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/19/2015 04:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann
wrote:
A reminder when updating a bug with information about a successful
bibisecting:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 04:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A reminder when updating a bug with information about a successful
>>> bibisecting: Do not only paste the commit m
On 10/19/2015 04:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
A reminder when updating a bug with information about a successful
bibisecting: Do not only paste the commit message of the first bad bibisect
repo commit, but: "please [also] provide eith
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>>
>> A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of
>> regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being
>> the lucky one to perform the 1000th one
On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of
regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being
the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)!
A reminder when updating a bug with infor
On 10/16/2015 08:29 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>> Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved?
>>
> Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED.
>
> (CLOSED bugs make up less than 1% of
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved?
>
Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED.
(CLOSED bugs make up less than 1% of the total -- we don't seem to
bother taking that last st
Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved?
Best,
Joel
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of
> regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for bein
Hi all,
A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of
regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being
the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)!
More here:
https://colonelqubit.wordpress.com/2015/10/15/libreoffice-qa-over-1000
16 matches
Mail list logo
