On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/19/2015 05:41 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit >>> message >>> mentions a range of more than one source commits. >>> >> No it is not irrelevant. with the bad bibisect commit, say >> c49af8fc6406f9e7e8e0b1dcebee6df87bdeb9aa >> you immediately have the answer you seek: >> >> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=bibisect-macosx-64-5.0.git;a=commit;h=c49af8fc6406f9e7e8e0b1dcebee6df87bdeb9aa > > > Read what I wrote: "No, that does not solve the problem *if all you know is > the commit message of a bibisect commit mentioning a single source commit.*" > (emphasis added)
Yeah.. and I read the given bugzilla entry too: Comment 5 Stephan Bergmann 2015-10-19 08:15:34 UTC (In reply to raal from comment #4) > This seems to have begun at the below commit. > Adding Cc: to sberg...@redhat.com ; Could you possibly take a look at this > one? Thanks > > 193ccffc25300d5c26e6f30ab06a2315b6bff879 is the first bad commit > commit 193ccffc25300d5c26e6f30ab06a2315b6bff879 > Author: Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> > Date: Sat Jul 11 20:21:02 2015 -0700 > > source sha:c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01 > > source sha:c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01 > > author Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> 2015-05-28 21:21:10 (GMT) > committer Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> 2015-05-28 21:21:10 (GMT) > commit c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01 (patch) raal, please provide either the commit message of the (last good) commit in the bibisect repo directly preceding this commit, or at least the URL of the bibisect repo (so I can determine that preceding commit myself). (Individual commits in bibisect repos often correspond to a range of source commits, so it is always important to know that full range.) The FULL RANGE here is that single source commit: c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01 commit from the bibisect commit 193ccffc25300d5c26e6f30ab06a2315b6bff879 and I know it is a single because it is the only one listed.. if there was more than one source commit between this bibisect commit and the previous bibisect commit they would all be listed there, as the example earlier showed. the format of my bibisect commit message is: short message: "source sha:<sha>" of the last source commit included followed by a blank line followed by the list of _all_ source sha included since the previous bibisect commit (including the one on the short message line) Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
