Hi,
> +1 to Tim below. IMHO if we're on the topic of adding another program
> to LibreOffice - Project Management (PM) should be considered over
> adding yet another open source Browser. I'm reasonably certain there
> are not enough resources at the moment to do this - at least not
> without partn
> i wonder why people say that an office suite needs to have an email
> client: is that only because Microsoft Office includes one?
Actually, I wonder the same thing.
Similar on the mozilla front: why should a browser include an calendar ?
I, personally, one tool for one job - simple and small -
> Unfortunately my first response is NO.
ACK. Different users prefer differnt browsers, so why adding
yet another one that many people wouldn't like anyways ?
Maybe there are some options for improving browser integration,
but that's a whole different topic, IMHO.
> Instead, in an other way, I'
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> i wonder why people say that an office suite needs to have an email
> client: is that only because Microsoft Office includes one?
It is not only, and even not principally, an email
client. Principally, it is what we used to call PIM
On 11/09/2012 10:17 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 09/11/12 08:28, Florian Monfort wrote:
But on the other side, browser extensions might actually be a good idea,
especially for Firefox and Chrome. Opening an odt directly in you
browser via a LibreOffice extension for example ?
there is already a
+1 to Tim below. IMHO if we're on the topic of adding another program to
LibreOffice - Project Management (PM) should be considered over adding yet
another open source Browser. I'm reasonably certain there are not enough
resources at the moment to do this - at least not without partnering/forki
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Mmmh.
>
> What about extensions for existing browsers ?
>
> You talk about creating a browser without even a differenciation
> factor
> which makes the idea irrelevant. And I'm not even talking about the
> resources as some of you might have mentioned.
>
> But on
-1 here too. I don't see it as a good idea, but then, unless I just
didn't notice, there haven't been any reasons given, which might make
a difference I suppose.
I do think fixing existing functionality would be much better spent
effort though.
Mark Stanton
One small step for mankind...
___
I can see the point behind working with one or more of the open source
browsers to better integrate libreoffice with the browser. I can even see
the point of offering that browser as part of the download, but I am not
convinced that writing yet another open source browser is a good idea. It
seems a
Hi there,
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 22:04 +0100, Randolph D. wrote:
> after some talks with some board members, the request rised to include
> more members and developers in the idea of adding a browser to
> Libreoffice.
As one of the board members Randolph E-mailed & since I responded to
him
On 09/11/12 08:28, Florian Monfort wrote:
> Mmmh.
>
> What about extensions for existing browsers ?
>
> You talk about creating a browser without even a differenciation factor
> which makes the idea irrelevant. And I'm not even talking about the
> resources as some of you might have mentioned.
>
-1 as well. Which board members did you talk to? I am suprized anny of them
would think it's a good idea.
Best,
Charles.
Le 9 nov. 2012 10:10, "Michael Stahl" a écrit :
> On 09/11/12 07:17, khagaroth wrote:
> > -1.
> >
> > If you want to add something new instead of improving the current
> > fu
On 09/11/12 07:17, khagaroth wrote:
> -1.
>
> If you want to add something new instead of improving the current
> functionality, the only thing that would make sense is an Outlook
> counterpart. That's the only thing that's missing for a complete
> office suite.
i wonder why people say that an of
Mmmh.
What about extensions for existing browsers ?
You talk about creating a browser without even a differenciation factor
which makes the idea irrelevant. And I'm not even talking about the
resources as some of you might have mentioned.
But on the other side, browser extensions might actually
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for bringing it up, yes I was keeping an eye on that for quite a while
:)
That is one of the most impressive and exciting features whenever I introduced
to people the experiments (broadway) in different premises. So I guess it would
be great to have more people getting invo
Yifan web based support is already in the works. Michael Meeks is
conducting that work, but its not ready for use yet.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Yi Fan Jiang wrote:
> Hi Randolph,
>
> Unfortunately my first response is NO.
>
> The development might be for fun, but I didn't see a persuasive
Hi Randolph,
Unfortunately my first response is NO.
The development might be for fun, but I didn't see a persuasive
reason of why we need one browser in a office suite. IMHO, in that case
we seem not to improve foreseeable usability, functionality or productivity
to the suite, will we?
Instead
Why not use something like the chromium browser ( aka chrome) that is open
source. Why would the wheel need to be reinvented?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> No.
>
> --tml
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.free
-1.
If you want to add something new instead of improving the current
functionality, the only thing that would make sense is an Outlook
counterpart. That's the only thing that's missing for a complete
office suite.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
No.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
I'm a common and simple user, no more, no less, so perhaps there's a
part of the picture i'm missing, but there are some questions that
arise:
- What would be the befenit of adding a browser to the current office suite ?
- What different features would keep you from reinventing the wheel /
allow
Dear all,
after some talks with some board members, the request rised to include more
members and developers in the idea of adding a browser to Libreoffice.
We know this needs time and work, but would not be impossible to add it to
the installer and create a place to be for it, and see, how the com
22 matches
Mail list logo
