> Please try to sort this out until Tuesday, 12 CET, so it does not delay
> 3.5.4-rc1 tag ;-)
Yes, sorry. It has been a very busy week for me and I didn't had any
free time to work on this. I'll have some free time at the end of this
week to work on this.
Sniff...
--
Jesús Corrius
On 14/05/12 17:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Jesús Corrius píše v Čt 03. 05. 2012 v 17:10 +0200:
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>>> But how can one in the module where something links to this library
>>> know if it has been built in debug mode or not?
>>
>> Then a better option
Jesús Corrius píše v Čt 03. 05. 2012 v 17:10 +0200:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > But how can one in the module where something links to this library
> > know if it has been built in debug mode or not?
>
> Then a better option is probably to change the static library
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> But how can one in the module where something links to this library
> know if it has been built in debug mode or not?
Then a better option is probably to change the static library name to
always be libpq.lib in all cases.
--
Jesús Corrius
On 03/05/12 14:50, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> But how can one in the module where something links to this library
> know if it has been built in debug mode or not?
looks like this should not depend on $(debug) but instead on
--enable-dbgutil, which is intended for such cases (see stlport, msvc
runtime
But how can one in the module where something links to this library
know if it has been built in debug mode or not?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi all,
I would like to have this commit cherry picked for the 3.5 branch, as
it would make my life much easier :)
More info in the commit log.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=db649c52911fd5b030a7e4e0c941d7ee75b98785
--
Jesús Corrius
___
