On 14/05/12 17:35, Petr Mladek wrote: > Jesús Corrius píše v Čt 03. 05. 2012 v 17:10 +0200: >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> wrote: >>> But how can one in the module where something links to this library >>> know if it has been built in debug mode or not? >> >> Then a better option is probably to change the static library name to >> always be libpq.lib in all cases. > > I am not sure how this is handled in other modules but the same name > looks like the best solution. Libraries always have the same name on > Linux and it works well.
the relevant criterion here is whether enabling debug produces a library that is ABI compatible. if it does, then using the same name is best. if it does not, then it should be enabled depending on whether --enable-dbgutil is set, and a different name can be easily handled in Repository_External.mk or RepositoryFixes.mk. > Please try to sort this out until Tuesday, 12 CET, so it does not delay > 3.5.4-rc1 tag ;-) probably too late now :) _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
