On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:02:43AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> Do I see the beginning of some "CWS" process here?
BTW, the main trouble with the CWS process was that it required the changes to
completely resolve some random bug description (aka. what some non-developer
dreamed up to be his pet s
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:02:43AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > So -- people with commit rights are not the issue:
> > - can commit directly to master on their own responsibility
> > (this should be discouraged, except for urg
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>> So -- people with commit rights are not the issue:
>> - can commit directly to master on their own responsibility
>> (this should be discouraged, except for urgent buildbre
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> So -- people with commit rights are not the issue:
> - can commit directly to master on their own responsibility
> (this should be discouraged, except for urgent buildbreaker fixes that save
>everyone pain)
Do I see the beg
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:54:42AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > On 01/06/12 15:01, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Michael Meeks
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> * Quality of round-robin patch review (Markus
