Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build issues.

2010-11-03 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Joseph Powers wrote: > Not sure if this is the correct patch > Looks good, works for me -> pushed. Many thanks! -- Thorsten pgpqYWy9gIFCd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freede

[Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build issues.

2010-11-02 Thread Joseph Powers
I'm not sure why this started by the following patch fixes the issue. 0001-Fix-build-issues.patch Description: Binary data Not sure if this is the correct patch (suggested by LeMoyne, I wasn't sure if I should fix the pl or fix the inputs...), but it builds and runs on Mac OS X. Form the fil

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Eric Hoch wrote: > [external (non-XCode-provided) dependencies when building on Mac] > > In this case yes :-) I didn't know that there are so many libs and > binaries needed at the moment. [...] > > Is this because of a new build process that LibO uses compar

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-08 Thread Joseph Powers
On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:35 +0200, Eric Hoch wrote: >> Looking at this list now it reminds me of the building the X11 OOo >> on the mac :-) > > Wow - we don't want to be that bad - obviously. > >> Is this because of a new bu

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Eric, On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:35 +0200, Eric Hoch wrote: > Looking at this list now it reminds me of the building the X11 OOo > on the mac :-) Wow - we don't want to be that bad - obviously. > Is this because of a new build process that LibO uses compared to > the one OOo uses?

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-08 Thread Eric Hoch
Hi Tor, Am Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:20:42 -0600 schrieb Tor Lillqvist: >>> On my 10.6.4 machine, I had to install the following to get >>> things to build: > [ a long list of packages ] > > That is presumably using a git checkout, intending to start with > running ./autogen.sh then? > >> I just reme

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-08 Thread Tor Lillqvist
>> On my 10.6.4 machine, I had to install the following to get things to build: [ a long list of packages ] That is presumably using a git checkout, intending to start with running ./autogen.sh then? > I just remember that the last time I > build a pre OOo 3.2.0 I was able to checkout the sourc

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-07 Thread Eric Hoch
Hi Joseph, Am Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:33:01 -0700 schrieb Joseph Powers: > On my 10.6.4 machine, I had to install the following to get things to build: > > autoconf 2.68 > automake 1.11.1 > coreutils 8.5 > gettext 0.18.1.1 > git 1.7.2.3 > g

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Build

2010-10-07 Thread Joseph Powers
On my 10.6.4 machine, I had to install the following to get things to build: autoconf2.68 automake1.11.1 coreutils 8.5 gettext 0.18.1.1 git 1.7.2.3 glib2.26.0 gmp 5.0.1 libIDL 0.8.14 libiconv