On 23/01/2012 22:30, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:39 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
Hi
Anyone else having trouble with adding address books to Libreoffice
(File->Wizard->Address book).
I'm getting "SDBC error" on my system, _git master LO_ on linux mint
11. Have both thunderbir
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:39 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
> Hi
>
> Anyone else having trouble with adding address books to Libreoffice
> (File->Wizard->Address book).
>
> I'm getting "SDBC error" on my system, _git master LO_ on linux mint
> 11. Have both thunderbird (repo) and evolution (repo) ins
Le 21/11/2011 17:39, Arno Teigseth a écrit :
Hi Arno,
Anyone else having trouble with adding address books to Libreoffice
(File->Wizard->Address book).
I'm getting "SDBC error" on my system, _git master LO_ on linux mint
11. Have both thunderbird (repo) and evolution (repo) installed.
The "m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Anyone else having trouble with adding address books to Libreoffice
(File->Wizard->Address book).
I'm getting "SDBC error" on my system, _git master LO_ on linux mint
11. Have both thunderbird (repo) and evolution (repo) installed.
The "more" but
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 05:35 +, swagat sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a .deb package of LO using epm.
> i have a 64-bit ubuntu machine.
> And the package generated is x86_64.
>
> I have to install it using --force-architecture option. I dont want
> that.
>
> Q1) How can I generate 32-
Hi,
I have created a .deb package of LO using epm.
i have a 64-bit ubuntu machine.
And the package generated is x86_64.
I have to install it using --force-architecture option. I dont want that.
Q1) How can I generate 32-bit package using epm?
Q2) Is the build we make machine specific? Like if I'
That is correct.
But that helps only when we install using 'make install'
In the deb package, it still installs in /opt
/solenv/bin/modules/installer/setupscript.pm
This script generates the setup script and uses all default variables.
How can i generate a customized deb package?
I wish to change
On 09/20/2011 10:11 AM, swagat sharma wrote:
I have generated a deb package of libreoffice using epm.
--enable-epm and with-package-format = deb
Now the package generated is installed by default in /opt directory.
How can I modify it to install in /usr/lib/ ?
Which variable to change/set?
Any
Hi
I have generated a deb package of libreoffice using epm.
--enable-epm and with-package-format = deb
Now the package generated is installed by default in /opt directory.
How can I modify it to install in /usr/lib/ ?
Which variable to change/set?
Any ideas?
Also I want to checkout 3.4 branch
Petr Mladek schrieb am Freitag, 5. August 2011 15:06:
> the first LO-3.4.2 package for SLED11-SP1, openSUSE-11.1, 11.2, 11.3,
> and 11.4 are available at
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/
I'm kissing your feet...
Finally, this is the first opensuse-package of open/
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 15:39 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> when i made the build and checked for the problem it was gone.
> Can anyone also check for the same?
In 3.3.2 if I insert a custom property, save to .doc and reopen it then
it appears. If I do the same in master it works, so yes, looks fixe
Hi Yi Fan,
the first LO-3.4.2 package for SLED11-SP1, openSUSE-11.1, 11.2, 11.3,
and 11.4 are available at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/
I hope that the packages for Factory will be ready later today.
Note that the repositories include also many obsolete LO-3.3
Hi Michael,
Glad to come across the fact that Custom Properties issue is solved in the
code I git cloned on 26th july.
I was having build issues since then, but finally when i made the build and
checked for the problem it was gone.
Can anyone also check for the same?
If it is solved, we can chan
Hi,
I made a build that was successful, but when I run make dev-install, it
fails.. Any ideas?
Also I want a .deb installation. How can I get it? I tried
--with-package-format="deb". Is this correct?
I got the following error code.
LibreOffice: Using system memory allocator.
LibreOffice: This is
Hi Swagat,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 15:45 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> Also when i hit git using http,
Hah - this is my fault; try:
git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/bootstrap.git libo
I'll update the website;
> Has it to do something with the server or pr
Also when i hit git using http,
git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap libo
I get the following error:
fatal: http://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/info/refs not
found: did you run git update-server-info on the server?
Has it to do something with the serve
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply.
I was not getting the codebase through git because I'm behind proxy. I tried
http as well, but couldn't manage to get the latest codebase.
The one I have was downloaded long back, so I was using it specifically for
my problem of custom properties.
And I read what
Hi Swagat,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:45 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> Thank you for the support.
> Now I am getting build errors. I have downloaded the all the tarballs
> of libreoffice 3.3.2.2.
Oh - goodness; 3.3.2.2 is a horribly old code-base; also building from
tar-balls is really not
Hi all,
Thank you for the support.
Now I am getting build errors. I have downloaded the all the tarballs of
libreoffice 3.3.2.2.
I have added all the dependencies by running
sudo apt-get build-dep libreoffice
./configure is running fine.
But when i run make, it gives the following errors:
found
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 11:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:15 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> > Thanks for your valuable time. I'll explain the problem in more
> > details.
>
> Great - that is most helpful :-)
>
> > I create a new Document (.odt file). I
ists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Christoph Noack
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 13:14
To: swagat sharma
Cc: LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org; michael.me...@novell.com
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LO Custom properties
Hi Swa
Hi Swagat,
sorry, no code help - but the hint that there is a specification that
describes what kinds of properties can be added. Unfortunately, the spec
doesn't cover file handling or migration issues :-\
http://specs.openoffice.org/appwide/fileIO/Custom_Document_Properties.odt
Maybe it helps .
Hi there,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:15 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> Thanks for your valuable time. I'll explain the problem in more
> details.
Great - that is most helpful :-)
> I create a new Document (.odt file). I add some custom properties, Say
> a text and a number, by going into Fi
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your valuable time.
I'll explain the problem in more details.
I create a new Document (.odt file). I add some custom properties, Say a
text and a number, by going into File->Properties->Custom Properties.
I save the file (as .odt) and close it. When I open the file, I go to
Hi Swagat,
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:14 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> I am working on fixing the custom properties in libre office, which
> are not preserved in MS format.
Sounds good - can you be more precise as to exactly which properties
you're talking about though ? :-)
> I need littl
Hi all,
I am working on fixing the custom properties in libre office, which are not
preserved in MS format.
I need little help as I have never worked on LO or OO before.
Can I know which all files are involved, or deals with custom properties.
Also how do we convert an .odt into a MS .doc.
Regard
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 01:22 -0700, djfw wrote:
> OK. Not getting any joy from the Doc list. Does anyone know of
> any doco for the LO Manager, apart from the code itself?
LO Manager ? :-) this is the first I heard of it, I assume you're
talking of:
http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum
OK. Not getting any joy from the Doc list. Does anyone know of any doco for
the LO Manager, apart from the code itself?
Cheers,
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-Manager-Config-file-shell-script-and-command-line-doco-tp3039513p3057941.html
Sent from
Please ignore, this was meant for the doc list.
Cheers,
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-Manager-Config-file-shell-script-and-command-line-doco-tp3039513p3039520.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Hi,
Is there any doco for the rc or shell files or command line for LO Manager?
I have tried the users forum and checked the help files, but no luck.
Cheers,
David
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-Manager-Config-file-shell-script-and-command-line-doco-tp30
On 17/05/11 15:13, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Hello,
current master, with ~/.libreoffice removed, fails on the first startup,
showing a dialog about not being able to lauch the application. Subsequent
launches are successful, but LO is unable to load or save any document (I
assume the first run resu
Hello,
current master, with ~/.libreoffice removed, fails on the first startup,
showing a dialog about not being able to lauch the application. Subsequent
launches are successful, but LO is unable to load or save any document (I
assume the first run resulted in a corrupted internal database
Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Do we have a page that I'm missing akin to either of these? And if
> not, would others agree that they would be of use?
>
I tend to summarize changes in my RC announcements (e.g.
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-3-3-2-Release-Candidate-2-available-tp2696004p2
Hullo List,
In a drive-by conversation, a friend recently asked me what was changed
between LO 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. Given my day job, I can't keep up with all
the messages that go by on this list, so I hastily searched for a
changelog of sorts. Someone suggested that we'd put a list of changes
Ok, sorry, I forget I have to generate headers, now it compiles fine.
Thanks!
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:18 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:35 +0100, Sergey wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to build my report generator with LibreOffice SDK and it
> > fails because it c
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:19 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I know not to long ago Caolan there were issues with trying to compile
> with gcc 4.5 is that still the case?
I don't know of any gcc 4.5 issues. Was building with it regularly until
a few weeks ago when I moved over to gcc 4.6.0
C.
_
I know not to long ago Caolan there were issues with trying to compile with
gcc 4.5 is that still the case?
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:35 +0100, Sergey wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to build my report generator with LibreOffice SDK
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:35 +0100, Sergey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build my report generator with LibreOffice SDK and it
> fails because it can't find com/sun/star/uno/Exception.hxx
Exception.hxx or Exception.hpp ? I suspect that its Exception.hpp
because thats the #include in cppuhelpe
Hello,
I am trying to build my report generator with LibreOffice SDK and it
fails because it can't find com/sun/star/uno/Exception.hxx which is get
included in libreoffice/basis-link/sdk/include/cppuhelper/bootstrap.hxx
I haven't tried to build it with OpenOffice SDK for some time, but my
last bui
> The bug only occurs, if the search _toolbar_ has been used before
> (unsuccessfully). It is probably related to issue
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33593#c1 which was fixed in
> Openoffice.org 3.3.0. This bug fix should also get into LO 3.3.1.
Acording to the bug report it was f
Some more details:
Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Dietmar:
> Could someone countercheck this please.
>
> In Calc use the "Search and Replace" dialog.
> Check "search in all tables"
> Search for a term that is NOT in the current table, but in anotherone.
> It is not found, but sho
Could someone countercheck this please.
In Calc use the "Search and Replace" dialog.
Check "search in all tables"
Search for a term that is NOT in the current table, but in anotherone.
It is not found, but should be.
Looks like the "search in all tables" just searches the current one.
Dietma
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 15:35 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Nadav,
>
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:37 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote:
> > I saw that LO 3.3 released:
> > http://www.libreoffice.org/download
> >
> > As the first stable version of LO, why there aren't any PR?
>
> No PR ? :-)
>
> > e
Hi Nadav,
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:37 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote:
> I saw that LO 3.3 released:
> http://www.libreoffice.org/download
>
> As the first stable version of LO, why there aren't any PR?
No PR ? :-)
> even the home page don't mention it.
Are you certain ? ;-) read agai
I saw that LO 3.3 released:
http://www.libreoffice.org/download
As the first stable version of LO, why there aren't any PR?
even the home page don't mention it.
thanks
Nadav
--
הבלוג שלי:
http://nadavvin.com
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@l
Hello:
I read the following note in the OOdev300m98 release notes..
Since the Mozilla product has long been superseded by the SeaMonkey
> > suite, and the profile formats of both changed incompatibly, the
> > Mozilla Address Book support in OpenOffice.org has been removed, in
> > favor
Hi Kendy,
On 30/12/2010 03:05, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Sophie,
Thank you for all the explanations! :-)
On 2010-12-29 at 21:00 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
This is now two/three months that we didn't touch the files because we
do not have them in the LO Pootle repository and we are not workin
Hi Sophie,
Thank you for all the explanations! :-)
On 2010-12-29 at 21:00 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> This is now two/three months that we didn't touch the files because we
> do not have them in the LO Pootle repository and we are not working any
> more on the OOo Pootle repository. So some
Hi Wol, *,
Wols Lists schrieb:
> On 10/12/10 21:18, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
[.. who misses useless UI features ..]
>> Again: see above. ("You told me to click the exclamation mark -
>> where should I click now?").
> Unfortunately, this then plays havoc with the next bunch of users -
> who
On 10/12/10 21:18, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
>> All I am going to add is: "which user prefers single-clicks for some
>> > status bar items and double-clicks on others, while some are not
>> > clickable at all?".
> One who has been told / has learned to do so and doesn't bother on any
> theory of
Hi Sebastian, *,
Sebastian Spaeth schrieb:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:59:37 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
wrote:
>> What You as an individual do use or don't *must not* be a criterium
>> for UI and feature changes. Even and especially not because You are
>> a software developer!
> Hi Friedrich,
>
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:59:37 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
wrote:
> What You as an individual do use or don't *must not* be a criterium
> for UI and feature changes. Even and especially not because You are a
> software developer!
Hi Friedrich,
this thread already became bigger than I ever intended
Hi Sebastian, *,
Sorry for late answer - I'm scanning the dev list occasionally only..
Sebastian Spaeth schrieb:
>Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
Shure not, but that is not the question in matter.
>About the only thing I actually use there, is the zoom sli
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
BLK selects (roughly) rectangular blocks (is this useful for anything?)
D.
Block selection is useful when copying text from PDF files
that were in columns.
___
LibreOffice mailing lis
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:28 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:03 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > Is there a use case to justify exposing any of this to users?
> >
> > Can you expand on what you mean by 'any of this'?
>
> I guess the root problem is that you can do ope
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:03 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Is there a use case to justify exposing any of this to users?
>
> Can you expand on what you mean by 'any of this'?
I guess the root problem is that you can do operations in a spreadsheet
that (when saved) produce a different do
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> - I have to single-click on the INSRT and STD->EXT->ADD->BLK and
> language selection thingies, but to double-click on the Page 1/1 and
> "Default" for something to happen. I just found out by coincidence
> today that I can l
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:22:36 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Sebastian Spaeth schrieb:
> > Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
> Yes ;)
OK, let me be more precise "has improvement potential in its current form" :)
> To learn more about the status bar have a look
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:50:28 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Information given by the status bar, plus the control options it gives,
> often is important for users I advise.
Nobody, lest I, doubts or denies that. But do your users like to
remember on which items they have to single, or double-click t
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:54:37 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > a) This is the standard state of my documents (see, I tend to modify
> > docs in a editor, DOH), and that exclamation mark purports some
> > sense of urgency and failure.
> Sorry I have to disagree there.
Thanks for the
Hi Joe,
Joe Smith wrote (30-11-10 18:30)
I think Sebastian has raised a number of good points. Forcing users to
deal with stuff that only experts care about is a huge problem with OOo;
I sincerely hope LibO can do better.
Information given by the status bar, plus the control options it gives,
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 12:30 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 09:54 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
> > and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
> > whether or not the document is currently modifi
> From what I've seen, users only expect one thing: a way to reliably
> save their work.
Of course, that is just because users of traditional desktop OSes have learned
it the hard way that you need to "save" your document often in order to avoid
data loss in case of crashes and whatnot.
In en
On 11/30/2010 09:54 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
whether or not the document is currently modified. A lot of people were
using the save icon status for that purpo
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:34 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> At 9:54am -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
> > and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
> > whether or not the document is currentl
At 9:54am -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
whether or not the document is currently modified. A lot of people
were using the save icon status for tha
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Spaeth schrieb:
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
Yes ;)
To learn more about the status bar have a look at
http://www.ooowiki.de/StatusLeiste. It is in German and needs an update,
but the text shows, that the status bar is a great
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:26 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> - What annoys me most is the "document modified indicator". If it is
> unmodified, I see some *empty* separators in the status bar (why do we
> show empty separators? these should GO GO GO away) and the mouse
> toolt
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 12:12 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> 2) Remove the Selection mode thing. Unless people are really using
> that.
I use it. Probably not often enough to warrant it being on the status
bar permanently, but it does get used.
Nigel
_
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:26:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
May I propose these changes to the writer statusbar? These have been
achieved by modifying a few lines of .xml and are much cleaner IMHO.
See the old and the new o
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
About the only thing I actually use there, is the zoom slidebar (and I
wouldn't use that if I were able to have a single "set 'optimal' zoom
button in my toolbar which doesn't seem possible).
- What annoys me most is the "docum
On 11/22/2010 01:52 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:43 -0800, NoOp wrote:
>> No answers for this on the user list, so I'll ask here:
> ..
>> Tools|Options|LibreOffice|General:
>> - Enable experimental (unstable) features
>>
>> Does anyone know what this enables?
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:43 -0800, NoOp wrote:
> No answers for this on the user list, so I'll ask here:
..
> Tools|Options|LibreOffice|General:
> - Enable experimental (unstable) features
>
> Does anyone know what this enables?
Certainly ! :-)
It enables in-line formu
No answers for this on the user list, so I'll ask here:
LibreOffice 3.3.0
OOO330m12 (Build:2)
libreoffice-build 3.2.99.3
Tools|Options|LibreOffice|General:
- Enable experimental (unstable) features
Does anyone know what this enables?
___
LibreOffice
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 15:33 -0800, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> At my limit with this but it might be helpful...
> Appears there are varied issues with system &/or our file picker ...
> From
> http://opengrok.go-oo.org/xref/libs-core/sfx2/source/dialog/filedlgimpl.hxx#mxFileDlg
What this boils d
At my limit with this but it might be helpful...
Appears there are varied issues with system &/or our file picker ...
From
http://opengrok.go-oo.org/xref/libs-core/sfx2/source/dialog/filedlgimpl.hxx#mxFileDlg
1315 sal_Int16 FileDialogHelper_Impl::implDoExecute()
1316 {
1317 preExec
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:14 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 10:55 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > Hi all, my build which is from somewhere in between beta2 and beta 3
> > (stable branch) crashes, when trying to "save as" the attached
> > index.html. Anyone inte
Gtk:ERROR:/build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.22.0/gtk/gtkfilesystemmodel.c:746:gtk_file_system_model_sort:
assertion failed: (r == n_visible_rows)
>
> Looks very much like a gtk+ issue. Perhaps related to memory corruption
> (but unlikely) - what version of gtk+ are you using ? and/or is there
> anyth
Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 10:55 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Hi all, my build which is from somewhere in between beta2 and beta 3
> (stable branch) crashes, when trying to "save as" the attached
> index.html. Anyone interested?
>
> gdb stacktrace:
>
> Gtk:ERROR:/build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.
DOH, was missing the last 10 backtrace lines. Here they are
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 0x7fffedbdf24d in GtkXLib::Yield(bool, bool) ()
from /opt/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/libvclplug_gtklx.so
#35 0x7312a571 in Application::Yield(bool) ()
from /opt/libreoffice/program/.
Rene Engelhard píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 16:48 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:45:57PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 1. installation root path:
> >
> > + /opt/libreoffice3 - used by the universal linux build by
> > default
>
> Well, I don't see why we
Fridrich Strba píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 08:55 -0600:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 2. user configuration:
> >
> > + ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build
> > + ~/.libreoffice/3- - proposed alternative
> >distro-specific path
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think about what package names and paths use for the openSUSE
> LibreOffice packages. I wonder how they should conflict with the
> universal Linux Libre Office build and what they should share with it.
>
> + /usr/lib(64)/lib
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:55:40AM -0600, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 2. user configuration:
> >
> > + ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build
> > + ~/.libreoffice/3- - proposed alternative
> >dist
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> 2. user configuration:
>
> + ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build
> + ~/.libreoffice/3- - proposed alternative
>distro-specific path, e.g. ~/.libreoffice/3-suse
> I tried to use the same
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:45:57PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> I think about what package names and paths use for the openSUSE
> LibreOffice packages. I wonder how they should conflict with the
> universal Linux Libre Office build and what they should share with it.
>
> I think that there are
Hi,
I think about what package names and paths use for the openSUSE
LibreOffice packages. I wonder how they should conflict with the
universal Linux Libre Office build and what they should share with it.
I think that there are three main things:
1. installation root path:
+ /opt/libreof
87 matches
Mail list logo
