Hi,
On Wednesday, 2012-01-25 15:33:13 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 14:05 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > I don't mind the removal of [LibreOffice], but I mind messing with the
> > reply-to
>
> Same here.
Same for me. But, I know that unfortunately there are uncapable
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 14:05 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>
> I don't mind the removal of [LibreOffice], but I mind messing with the
> reply-to
Same here.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>> could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
>> [Libreoffice] to the beginning?
>
> I'd be up for that, in the absence of any violent objections
OK, thanks for the pointer. I withdraw my vehement opposition then
F.
On 25/01/12 16:25, Lubos Lunak wrote:
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/11/filter-messages-from-mailing-list-in.html
disagrees.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
>> While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
>> libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
>
> Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on *shrug*. You
> just need to get a
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > (and the filter-it-out suggestion is ridiculous, what if somebody really
> > explicitly also CC-ed me e.g. because it's urgent?).
>
> http://help.cselabs.umn.edu/email/procmail ;)
Cool! So what exactly is the rule t
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> On 24/01/12 16:26, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > - it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
> > browsing mail
> > - which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between
> > such mailing lists
> > - it m
Lubos Lunak wrote:
> (and the filter-it-out suggestion is ridiculous, what if somebody really
> explicitly also CC-ed me e.g. because it's urgent?).
>
http://help.cselabs.umn.edu/email/procmail ;)
-- Thorsten, who simply can't resist the bikeshedding
pgpORhGZR0Ryo.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On 24/01/12 16:26, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
browsing mail
- which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between such
mailing lists
- it makes adding tags like [PUSHED] more cumbersome
- one would hope that by 201
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies to my
> > mails, I would have said so.
>
> This might be a controversial issue. While I too feel I don't require
> to receive a perso
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lubos Lunak schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
> >> While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
> >> libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
> >
> > Oh, well, that's something people will probably never
On 01/25/2012 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies to my
mails, I would have said so.
This might be a controversial issue. While I too feel I don't require
to receive a personal to/cc in a response to a mail I sent to the list,
I already got
Hi,
Lubos Lunak schrieb:
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on *shrug*. You
just need to get a mail client that is modern enough (t
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
> While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
> libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on *shrug*. You
just need to get a mail client that is modern enough (that's, like, last
decade)
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 21:01 +0100, khagaroth wrote:
> While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
> libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Which is an abomination :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
Lubos Lunak wrote:
> could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
> [Libreoffice] to the beginning?
>
Yes.
> - one would hope that by 2012 everybody interested in filtering mail can
> actually do it based on the List-Id header, which has the additional benefit
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
> [Libreoffice] to the beginning?
I'd be up for that, in the absence of any violent objections /
industrial-scale bike-shed construction, lets make a decis
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
[Libreoffice] to the beginning?
- it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
browsing mail
- which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between such
mailing list
19 matches
Mail list logo
