On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 01/25/2012 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies to my > > mails, I would have said so. > > This might be a controversial issue. While I too feel I don't require > to receive a personal to/cc in a response to a mail I sent to the list, > I already got (indirect) complaint that people did not notice my replies > to their mails-to-list when I sent the reply to the list only. So, I > got into the habit of reply-all.
Well, I can start complaining about the extra copies whenever I get one if that helps anything :). There exists http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html , which should help with this. There's of course the usual problem of some mail clients not bothering to support useful functionality, but if the reply-to-munging-harmful crowd can waive that argument off, I don't see why the same couldn't be done here. Besides, there's the much simpler way of getting the copy by making a filter rule on "In-Reply-To:.*<email>*". Another reason is that this gives everybody a choice whether they want the extra copy or not, whereas reply-to-all forces everybody to get the duplicate (and the filter-it-out suggestion is ridiculous, what if somebody really explicitly also CC-ed me e.g. because it's urgent?). -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
