Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: >> I haven't >> checked for other modules, and I certainly agree that for >> java-extensions and external java module like tomcat we probably don't >> want to go that route... > > Yup.  But wow, isn't tomcat a http server?  What do we even use

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2011/9/21 Kohei Yoshida : > Yup.  But wow, isn't tomcat a http server?  What do we even use tomcat > for? ;-) > Wiki extension ;) Tom ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreof

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:06 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Kohei Yoshida > wrote: > > > > What I like about ant is that you don't need to list every single java > > source file you need to compile, whereas in make you do (unless I'm > > missing something). That

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > What I like about ant is that you don't need to list every single java > source file you need to compile, whereas in make you do (unless I'm > missing something).  That makes a huge difference and makes the ant > build script very small reg

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 19:29 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Kohei Yoshida > wrote: > > > > Well, if ant is used to build Java jar packages, then, I would prefer > > ant be used because ant's build script is much simpler than make's for > > Java packages. For Jav

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Well, if ant is used to build Java jar packages, then, I would prefer > ant be used because ant's build script is much simpler than make's for > Java packages.  For Java, ant is pretty much the standard build > system. The problem is 'ant'

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi guys, On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter Foley wrote: >> Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5 >> modules. >> >> beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge >> >> I was wondering if there is any particu

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Peter Foley
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > > Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5 > > modules. > > > > beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge > > > > I was wondering if there is any particular reason for u

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5 > modules. > > beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge > > I was wondering if there is any particular reason for using apache ant or > if it would be a good idea to convert t

[Libreoffice] [RFC] use of apache ant in libreoffice

2011-09-20 Thread Peter Foley
Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5 modules. beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge I was wondering if there is any particular reason for using apache ant or if it would be a good idea to convert these modules to use plain gbuild Jars? Peter ___