On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 08:50 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Not trying to hijack, but i'm still a novice developer still learning
> the ways of development, but is there such a thing as over optimization?
Certainly :-) eg. writing in-line assembly for the "button clicked"
method (or an
Not trying to hijack, but i'm still a novice developer still learning
the ways of development, but is there such a thing as over optimization?
On 1/12/11 7:36 PM, Noel Power wrote:
On 12/01/11 18:03, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
On Wed, 12
On 12/01/11 18:03, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power wrote:
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffic
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power wrote:
>
>> Hi there
>>
>> fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
>> riskless etc.
>>
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe22660
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power wrote:
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daacead0e1
is ripe for signoff and cherrypicking, be g
Hi Noel,
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:18 +, Noel Power wrote:
> fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
> riskless etc.
wow - that is a surprising code flow :-)
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daace
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daacead0e1
is ripe for signoff and cherrypicking, be grateful if someone could help
with that
thanks,
Noel
