Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:15pm -0500 Wed, 09 Nov 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:40 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: Summary : Isn't "Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into the merged cell?" better ? I like the following better: Do you want to merge the contents of the se

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Maxime de Roucy
> I agree with the wording of the question, but "will only retain" to me > sounds as if the content of other cells would be lost, which isn't the > case, it's just not displayed and hidden in the merged cells. We also > should avoid terms like upper-left, as in a right-to-left environment it > woul

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, Isnt this something for ux-advise? Best, Bjoern On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:22:27AM +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > Maxime de Roucy schrieb: > >Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 15:15 -0500, Kohei Yoshida a écrit : > >>On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:40 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: > >>

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, Maxime de Roucy schrieb: Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 15:15 -0500, Kohei Yoshida a écrit : On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:40 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: Summary : Isn't "Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into the merged cell?" better ? I like the following better:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Maxime de Roucy
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 15:15 -0500, Kohei Yoshida a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:40 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: > > > Summary : > > Isn't "Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into > > the merged cell?" better ? > > I like the following better: > > Do you wa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-10 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Wednesday, 2011-11-09 15:15:33 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Isn't "Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into > > the merged cell?" better ? > > I like the following better: > > Do you want to merge the contents of the selected cells into one cell? > Clicking 'No'

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-09 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:40 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: > Summary : > Isn't "Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into > the merged cell?" better ? I like the following better: Do you want to merge the contents of the selected cells into one cell? Clicking 'No' will only

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-09 Thread Maxime de Roucy
Hi Eike Thanks for taking my suggestion into consideration :-) > I agree that the dialog's current message maybe isn't the best. A new > string however should somehow describe that when the question is > answered with yes then > * all content of to be merged cells will be removed > * all content

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-09 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Maxime, On Monday, 2011-11-07 10:58:13 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote: > I think the STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY (in sc/source/ui/src/globstr.src ; used > in Calc when merging cells) is not very understandable for common > users : "Should the contents of the hidden cells be moved into the first > cell?"

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

2011-11-07 Thread Maxime de Roucy
Hello I think the STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY (in sc/source/ui/src/globstr.src ; used in Calc when merging cells) is not very understandable for common users : "Should the contents of the hidden cells be moved into the first cell?" I think "Would you like to merge the contents of all cells?" would be bet