On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:30 -0800, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
>
> Noel Power wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if the recent rebase to OOO330m13 is the culprit, would be
> > interesting if you could test against the corresponding oracle dev build
> >
> Yes, I see that test would be useful.
> Not about
Noel Power wrote:
>
> I wonder if the recent rebase to OOO330m13 is the culprit, would be
> interesting if you could test against the corresponding oracle dev build
>
Yes, I see that test would be useful.
Not about to setup an OOO build, but will consider it if you think that
would be useful
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:30 -0800, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
>
> Noel Power wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if the recent rebase to OOO330m13 is the culprit, would be
> > interesting if you could test against the corresponding oracle dev build
> >
> Yes, I see that test would be useful.
> Not about
Hi guys,
I mistakenly pushed Mattias patch this morning... that shouldn't harm,
but I though it would be good for you to know it for later
investigations.
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 14:14 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> On 6 November 2010 12:13, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Ok, aft
Noel Power wrote:
>
> No, I don't mean setting up an OOO build ;-) but just checking against a
> OOO330m13 dev build ( that can downloaded from openoffice.org )
>
OIC, I was making it too hard - rooted around at OOo and found the debs...
Thanks -- LeMoyne
--
View this message in context:
h
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:38 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> Dang, I was hoping it would stop counting at least some punctuation as a
> word.(period). Don't know what to say other than test before and after.
Just some random thought here: would you be able to write some unit
tests for this?
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 18:13 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> Hi all,
[...]
> Still new to git but I am sure I saw and built and ran the old txtedt.cxx
> and still no LSQEW. Feelin' a bit lost ... I can think of some other
> options for trying to find what fixed the LSQEW but I feel like I'm ch
On 6 November 2010 12:13, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Ok, after getting over a short-term dislike of Word Count - with a new found
> appreciation for some of the developer comments in OOo issuezilla - I had a
> new idea for a test plan. Perhaps turning on the Scanner clipping has
> *
Hi all,
Ok, after getting over a short-term dislike of Word Count - with a new found
appreciation for some of the developer comments in OOo issuezilla - I had a
new idea for a test plan. Perhaps turning on the Scanner clipping has
*accidentally* fixed the quote problem as well. Although I inte
On 5 November 2010 20:16, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:38 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
>> There isn't a bug report in the LO tracker, but there are quite a few
>> in the OO.o issue tracker. The basic issue number is 89042, with
>> 97116, 102270, 107241, 1133
Hi Mattias,
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:38 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> There isn't a bug report in the LO tracker, but there are quite a few
> in the OO.o issue tracker. The basic issue number is 89042, with
> 97116, 102270, 107241, 113375, and 108072 marked as duplicates.
Hum, I saw that one..
Hi again,
Well I suggested it so ran a few tests after a full re-build finished. I
was curious. I don't think the target should be 'counts exactly like Word'
but certainly a quotation mark shouldn't count as its own word when it is
adjacent to text on either side. Especially there shouldn't b
Hi Mattias and Cedric,
OOo issue #i89042 also has a test document that gives expected results over
several selections.
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n1845889/i89042_Word_count_with_quotes.odt
i89042_Word_count_with_quotes.odt
The issue *appears* to involve only leading special q
On 5 November 2010 02:29, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:41 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
>> > Patch attached. It's a very minimal change, so it's probably safe to
>> > push into the 3.3 branch as well as master.
>
> Do you have some bug report describing the p
Hi Mattias,
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:41 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> > Patch attached. It's a very minimal change, so it's probably safe to
> > push into the 3.3 branch as well as master.
Do you have some bug report describing the problem? I'ld like to test
this and eventually add the fixed b
Yes, I spotted that after I sent it, and resent with the attachment :-)
However, I still forgot to mention: code is contributed under MPL 1.1
/ GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ licenses.
In my defence, it's pretty late here :-P
On 4 November 2010 23:49, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> On Thu, 2010-11
Hi Mattias,
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:38 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> Patch attached. It's a very minimal change, so it's probably safe to
> push into the 3.3 branch as well as master.
It seems that you forgot to actually attach the patch ;)
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
ht
On 4 November 2010 23:38, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> After spending a number of hours learning more about unicode than I
> ever wanted to know, I've fixed the bug where the word counter in
> Writer counts an opening quote mark (unicode symbol 0x201C) as an extra
> word.
>
> Turns out that the openi
After spending a number of hours learning more about unicode than I
ever wanted to know, I've fixed the bug where the word counter in
Writer counts an opening quote mark (unicode symbol 0x201C) as an extra
word.
Turns out that the opening quote lives in unicode block 40, which was
not given an ass
19 matches
Mail list logo
